Posted on 06/23/2009 5:40:12 AM PDT by fiodora
I'm wondering how long it will be before the word "impeachment" starts being bantered about?
The list of reasons to expel Obama keeps getting longer and stronger, and this is only five months into his reign.
Everyone knows about his inexperience. His rhetorical abilities made people overlook this weakness. Even his eligibility to have become president is becoming an issue.
He places personal and party ideologies over what is best for America. I thought when appointing justices, it was supposed to be "the best person for the job" and "justice is blind." Affirmative-action policies and "empathy" aren't part of the requirements for appointment.
He fits the definition of being a narcissist perfectly. This makes him extremely dangerous for the country. He only cares about what is best for him, not the country.
He is ashamed of our country (as was his wife until Barack won his party's nomination) even though it has given him immense amounts of opportunity. He constantly feels the need to apologize for our country's history of perceived repressiveness.
Sorry, Barack, we are the greatest country in the history of the world. No country has done more for other countries where there has been suppression of human rights, and Americans are unmatched in raising money and supplies for others when natural disasters hit.
You have been hanging around the Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers too long.
You have been going around (the Muslim world in particular), speaking of "the promise of a secular nation." How much more arrogant and ignorant can you be?
Even though you think highly of your rhetorical skills, you are not going to change the fact that a vast majority of Americans believe in God.
Why do you keep implying to other countries that our country was not founded on Judeo-Christian principles?
Your history of duplicity is unmatched. This was illustrated numerous times throughout the campaign. You carry it forward into your presidency.
You incur the largest-ever budget deficit and then insist that we operate on a pay-as-you-go principle from now on. Of course, shortly thereafter, you exempt your government-run health program costs from this rule. You are great with smoke and mirrors, Barack. You are the ultimate flim-flam man.
You are a corrupt man. You appoint tax cheats and disreputable people to positions of power. You promise no lobbyists in your administration, yet no other administration had close to the number you now have.
You fire people who uncover very serious issues of impropriety by organizations run by individuals who are close friends of yours. You had your Justice Department cancel a criminal suit against goons, representing your friends ACORN and the Black Panthers, involving voter intimidation tactics at election polls.
You are dishonest and lie when it serves your purposes. Including examples above, you ridiculed John McCain's idea of taxing employer-funded health insurance premiums, promising never to follow such a policy during your administration.
Change your mind, Obama? You promised no tax increases for individuals making under $250,000. What do you call proposals like getting rid of tax-excludable programs like Health Savings Accounts and Flexible Spending Accounts?
Millions of middle- and low-income individuals participate in these programs. What do you call new taxes proposed on soda and beer? I guess only the rich drink these.
You are proposing one of the largest increases in corporate taxes in history. Who do you think ends up paying for these increased costs of doing business?
I think these mentioned items also fall under the topic of incompetence. And I thought we could never get a leader less competent than Jimmy Carter. I was wrong.
How about your lying to the American Medical Association? You specifically said, "I'll be honest, there are countries where a single-payer system works pretty well."
Why couldn't your press secretary name just one when pressed for an example?
Why did your mainstream media stooges, especially The Washington Post, The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, specifically leave that quote out of their news articles, but quote everything said before and after that part of your speech perfectly?
You continually show disrespect for and trample on our Constitution, especially when it bars you from enacting your most radical ideas.
There is hope, however. Sixty-six percent of the voters from age 18 to 30 voted for you while only 32 percent voted for McCain. Voters 30 and above, on the other hand, favored you by a margin of only 50 percent to 49 percent.
Do you think you can fool the younger voting bloc twice, Barack? I don't think so, especially when they see the impact of your socialist agenda on their lives. Maybe we won't have to wait another 31/2 years for "change."
.
I agree. Sticker/remarks like “Where is Lee Harvey Oswald, now that we really need him?” is not the way to go. It brings us down to the level of the Democrats.
We are better than that.
.
If there’s anything this country does NOT need, is HolyO becoming a martyr to the liberal cause—it’s bad enough people already compare him to Martin Luther King, Jr. who actually DID accomplish something with his life!! This one doesn’t have ANYTHING worthy on his resume to even get close! >:-(
Chief, I believe that it is the Constitution that will cause his downfall, make no mistake.
But the President has NO spending authority whatsoever.
The real problem lies with Congress.
As in “this guy has been smokin’ something.”
Obama has presided over a tremendous increase in Democrat power. They LOVE the man. He’s not goin’ anywhere.
Has anyone taken a look around our country lately? Has anyone bothered to notice that people like Springer and Maury Povich are still on television?
We are a nation overwhelmed by utter morons who have no clue about the Constitution or the Federal Government. These people vote and have put in control people who not only support and cover for Obama, but are also willing to do his bidding.
The notion that Obama will ever be impeached is laughable. There is a better chance of a third term than impeachment.
Reagan vs. Carter.
Bush vs. Dukakis.
Clinton vs. Bush.
Clinton vs. Dole
Bush II vs. Gore.
Bush II vs. Kerry.
Obama vs. McCain.
In each case, the “better looking” candidate won. You really need some women to properly evaluate the physical appearance of each of these candidates, but that's my theory and I'm stickin’ to it.
BTW, VPs don't count or Sarah Palin might have won it for McCain.
IMHO, the first thing that the ‘Pubbies should think about for their next candidate should be his appearance. Thanks to TV, the days in which extraordinary men of ordinary handsomeness winning national elections based on their abilities and principles are over. A Winston Churchill wouldn't stand a chance in the US national elections.
Thank your lucky stars Clinton wasn't convicted. Al Gore would have been the sitting president and likely would have defeated Bush in the 2000 elections.
Yes. I’m convivned that we will never see elections again.
So we do away with the Constitution to save the Constitution?
“I would love to see him dragged out kicking and screaming, with Michelleonista the Fashion Maven, on the floor hanging onto his ankles!!”
##########
LOL! That would be quite a sight!
The first opportunity will be at:
12:00:01 EST January 20th, 2013
If we don’t get it done then...
12:00:01 EST January 20th, 2017
If we don’t get it done then...
Well...Who knows...
LOL Oh yeah, that would be the {{ultimate dreamy fantasy!}}
you might enjoy this too... I’m plastering it everywhere..
Just got this in an email..
Greg Morton’s “obama man”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhhkF3dqXR0&feature=player_embedded
I repeat myself, but what the heck..I shall plaster it everywhere..
Very, very cute video! I also see that its had more than 2 million hits.
I wish he would do one on the Birth Certificate.
What a classic! LOL!
I’m already forwarding it on...thanks!
Glad you enjoyed it!
I got that link from hubby.. :)
Oh yeah, he should do one on the birth certificate. I bet someone of FR could do a great one.
What constitutionally authorized mechanism do you see to restore this government to the people? The GOP can't even figure out how to hold it's own primaries without genuflecting to liberals. Do you expect them to overcome voter fraud next election cycle and then control themselves and the government should they win? What was the last major government program killed by Republicans?
The original comment was regarding impeachable offenses by President Obama. If you had two independent, verifiable videos of him hacking up supporters of the opposition party in Kenya when he was campaigning over there would it be enough? If an impeccable source produced a Kenyan birth certificate, an Indonesian passport and audio of him saying his morning prayers to Mecca would it be enough? I think a huge portion of his followers, including most of congress, could squeeze their eyes shut and ignore almost anything.
Like Yuri Bezmenov said of socialism's useful idiots "You cannot change their mind even if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still can not change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. (snip) A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him, even if I shower him with information, with authentic proof, with documents and pictures. ...he will refuse to believe it.... That's the tragedy of the situation of demoralization."
Lots of alarmists were called kooks in Germany in the early thirties even though Hitler told everyone exactly what he was going to do in Mein Kamph.
I wonder if the CIA might have a few ideas!! ;-)
HE DID DEFEAT BUSH IN THE 2000 ELECTION!!!! BUSH CHEATED!!!! WAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
</wacky liberals off>
Hy-larious!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.