[Two Ravens]

The only way one can posit an insane designer is to point to evidence of that insanity in the design. Quite the opposite is the case.

The insanity (or ineptitude) in the design has been the topic of all of my posts on this thread.

[count-your-change]

More like variations of #52:

“The existence of cancer pretty much destroys any argument for teleology in nature.”

How that is so you make no argument. In post #100 you claim misuse of something is evidence of an “inept or insane designer” since the user is part of the design.

But that argument fails on the point that the decision of the user to choose a certain use is not part of the design.

Or do you ascribe to the notion that a certain design should be impossible to misuse?

[UCANSEE2]

The insanity (or ineptitude) in the design has been the topic of all of my posts on this thread.

Yet, what is your point?

For all it's insanity, the design has worked for either 6000 or 14.7 billion years.

In Biblical or Scientific terms, that is forever.

BTW, 99% of life forms on the Earth, since the beginning of time, have gone extinct.

One might see 'insanity' in that.