[Two Ravens]

Or that the best design can fail under misuse or under conditions it was not designed for or from external assault.

While those conditions certainly apply in the case of ordinary finite designers and designs, appealing to them in this instance doesn't save your argument, since you are positing a designer who designed everything that exists.

Thus, "misuse" logically indicates and inept designer, since those who "misuse" the design are themselves part of that design.

And there can be no external assault, if you are claiming that everything that exists was designed by said entity.

[count-your-change]

I posit no such thing and if someone else did please point it out to me.

“While those conditions certainly apply in the case of ordinary finite designers and designs, appealing to them in this instance doesn’t save your argument, since you are positing a designer who designed everything that exists.”.