To: Squidpup
But Frankel conceded it may take more than debate of Jewish law, or halacha, to alter centuries of tradition in favor of a compromise by which Jews would agree to build a temple nearby, not in the spot traditionally regarded as the correct site -- right where the Dome has stood since the 7th century. Since when were the written Torah and the Tanakh demoted to a matter of "tradition"?
2 posted on
06/19/2009 10:51:47 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
To: Carry_Okie
Interesting that no one dares suggest the Muslims seek a “holy revelation” to move their Dome of the Rock.
5 posted on
06/19/2009 11:29:55 PM PDT by
Talisker
(When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
To: Carry_Okie
Invitations to Thursday's launch conference depict a sunlit imagined future for the area Jews call Temple Mount. Happy Muslims and harp-playing Jews mingle between the Dome of the Rock and a new Temple, as Christians walk over from the nearby Sepulchre Church, traditional site of Jesus's resurrection. This isn't "imagination." It's delusional. It's sick. It's insane. It's surreal. It's lunacy. And besides that, it's ridiculous and embarrassing!
Happy Muslims and harp-playing Jews?
Not in this life.
9 posted on
06/20/2009 12:54:05 AM PDT by
MestaMachine
(I don't have a novel or insightful tagline. At this point, words fail me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson