I did a title search and didn't see this posted. If it's a duplicate, I apologize..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Really what are they gonna do? I could ge real incomptetent real fast. Beg senior moment etc.
38 posted on
06/19/2009 8:13:29 AM PDT by
CPT Clay
(Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I want to know why we should give information to a fake POTUS and his fake administration?
43 posted on
06/19/2009 8:15:53 AM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
46 posted on
06/19/2009 8:17:36 AM PDT by
VTenigma
To: GeorgiaDawg32
anyone know where a complete copy of this questionnare can be found? Ridicule can be a potent weapon.
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I look at it a different way. Often one needs much more than just numbers to make an accurate count. You need actually to identify the inhabitants, so that they are not double-counted or missed.
This is a long tradition since 1850.
The information collected is very useful historically, especially for family history studies.
Here is the paradox: by asking overly invasive questions, a cry of “privacy right” will arise, and the data from these records may be ritualistically destroyed, so that researchers will have nothing at all to go by.
59 posted on
06/19/2009 8:28:47 AM PDT by
docbnj
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I just fill the form with BS answers especially regarding my race and income. All the US Constitution requires in a census is a counting of noses nothing more.
67 posted on
06/19/2009 8:41:29 AM PDT by
The Great RJ
("The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Bachmann’s the real deal. She’s our Margaret Thatcher.
86 posted on
06/19/2009 9:07:18 AM PDT by
TheThinker
(America doesn't have a president. It has a usurper.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Right on. I am doing what Michelle is doing, they will get the number living in the house and that is it. FUBO and ACORN.
92 posted on
06/19/2009 9:30:21 AM PDT by
Danae
(Amerikan Unity My Ass)
To: NorthWoody; Manic_Episode; mikethevike; coder2; AmericanChef; Reaganesque; ER Doc; lesser_satan; ...
WELCOME TO FREE REPUBLIC’S MINNESOTA PING LIST!
125 MEMBERS AND GROWING...!
FREEPMAIL ME IF YOU WANT ON OR OFF THIS LIST!
To: GeorgiaDawg32
It has only been posted about 3 or four times. Maybe not this same article. However, the more it is posted the better as far as I am concerned. The constitution says we only have to answer questions about how many people live at our residence. Any other laws passed which require more info are unconstitutional. You only have to answer the population questions. If you are terrified of not answering the other questions just lie. As for me, I am going to do as I have always done and only answer those questions required by the constitution and no others.
98 posted on
06/19/2009 9:49:27 AM PDT by
calex59
To: GeorgiaDawg32
does anyone have a link to the questions that are asked?
100 posted on
06/19/2009 9:56:35 AM PDT by
MNDude
To: GeorgiaDawg32
She sent a portion of the U.S. legal code that says anyone over 18 years of age who refuses to answer “any of the questions” on the census can be fined up to $5,000.
Does it have to be truthful? Everyone should say they have 25 bathtubs and 0 bathrooms.
101 posted on
06/19/2009 9:57:36 AM PDT by
DManA
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I have no intention of filling it out either. They get to know how many people live her, nothing more. Not names, NOTHING ELSE. If they aren’t local people that come to my door and they even remotely look like ACORN workers, I’m not even telling them how many people live here. They can fine me. The fine is small.
102 posted on
06/19/2009 9:57:44 AM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Not your verse but another one:
Apocalypse of St John 13:1 And I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten diadems, and upon his heads names of blasphemy. 2 And the beast, which I saw, was like to a leopard, and his feet were as the feet of a bear, and his mouth as the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his own strength, and great power. 3 And I saw one of his heads as it were slain to death: and his death's wound was healed. And all the earth was in admiration after the beast. 4 And they adored the dragon, which gave power to the beast: and they adored the beast, saying: Who is like to the beast? and who shall be able to fight with him? 5 And there was given to him a mouth speaking great things, and blasphemies: and power was given to him to do two and forty months. 6 And he opened his mouth unto blasphemies against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. 7 And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them. And power was given him over every tribe, and people, and tongue, and nation. 8 And all that dwell upon the earth adored him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb, which was slain from the beginning of the world. 9 If any man have an ear, let him hear. 10 He that shall lead into captivity, shall go into captivity: he that shall kill by the sword, must be killed by the sword. Here is the patience and the faith of the saints. 11 And I saw another beast coming up out of the earth, and he had two horns, like a lamb, and he spoke as a dragon. 12 And he executed all the power of the former beast in his sight; and he caused the earth, and them that dwell therein, to adore the first beast, whose wound to death was healed. 13 And he did great signs, so that he made also fire to come down from heaven unto the earth in the sight of men. 14 And he seduced them that dwell on the earth, for the signs, which were given him to do in the sight of the beast, saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make the image of the beast, which had the wound by the sword, and lived. 15 And it was given him to give life to the image of the beast, and that the image of the beast should speak; and should cause, that whosoever will not adore the image of the beast, should be slain. 16 And he shall make all, both little and great, rich and poor, freemen and bondmen, to have a character in their right hand, or on their foreheads. 17 And that no man might buy or sell, but he that hath the character, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. 18 Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast. For it is the number of a man: and the number of him is six hundred sixty-six.
I have previously indicated that if you take the original meanings of the words "Barack" and "Hussein" and "Obama" and put them together, they are the definition of the word: Lucifer.
103 posted on
06/19/2009 9:57:47 AM PDT by
HighlyOpinionated
(Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
So many questions. Please come in while I discuss them over a nice Chianti.
109 posted on
06/19/2009 10:18:20 AM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
The answer to all questions beyond the number of people in the household should be NOYDB (None of your damn business).
To: GeorgiaDawg32
I just called my Senators to complain. Hagan’s office dumpoed me to voicemail.
Burr’s office said they were beginning to hear about this from constituents. I suggested he and the other pubbies take a clue from Bachmann and refuse to answer the intrusive un-Constitutional questions and that many of the citizens would be right there with them. I told him NC wants leadership.
121 posted on
06/19/2009 10:58:12 AM PDT by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
![Photobucket](http://i616.photobucket.com/albums/tt250/sohccammer427/michelle-bachman.jpg)
The lady in not even in my district, but she sure has my vote.
122 posted on
06/19/2009 11:08:00 AM PDT by
CodeJockey
(If you can read this thank a teacher, if you can read it in English thank a Soldier.)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
...she also fears ACORN, the community organizing group that came under fire for its voter registration efforts last year, will be part of the Census Bureau's door-to-door information collection efforts.
I wonder...
Would it be against the law to refuse to fill out the census from or answers questions from someone who is from "ACORN"?
If not against the law, then I would suggest that people insist on knowing what organization a census worker represents. It must be insisted that census workers wear very prominent ID tags which lists their names and the organization through which they're working.
Then, whenever a worker from "ACORN" knocks on your door, you have the right to refuse to answer any of his/her questions and you could insist the census bureau send somebody from any other organization not related to ACORN.
127 posted on
06/19/2009 11:48:52 AM PDT by
adorno
(Where is Branch 4?)
To: GeorgiaDawg32; bamahead; nw_arizona_granny; appleseed; sickoflibs; Clintonfatigued; ...
160 posted on
06/19/2009 4:48:19 PM PDT by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson