To: Always Right
More and more real scientists are worried about their own credibility. Backing an unobservable, unverifiable and untestable theory as fact flies in the face of actual science.
10 posted on
06/17/2009 7:40:20 AM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Sgt_Schultze
More and more real scientists are worried about their own credibility. Backing an unobservable, unverifiable and untestable theory as fact flies in the face of actual science. I am kind of disgusted it took so long though. Computer models which don't even model 10% of factors which effect climate and represent mostly guesses at that, are not science. It is ridiculous as to what has passed as science for decades without every scientific organization raising hell. Most of the organizations backed the sham.
11 posted on
06/17/2009 7:56:06 AM PDT by
Always Right
(Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson