Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right

More and more real scientists are worried about their own credibility. Backing an unobservable, unverifiable and untestable theory as fact flies in the face of actual science.


10 posted on 06/17/2009 7:40:20 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Sgt_Schultze
More and more real scientists are worried about their own credibility. Backing an unobservable, unverifiable and untestable theory as fact flies in the face of actual science.

I am kind of disgusted it took so long though. Computer models which don't even model 10% of factors which effect climate and represent mostly guesses at that, are not science. It is ridiculous as to what has passed as science for decades without every scientific organization raising hell. Most of the organizations backed the sham.

11 posted on 06/17/2009 7:56:06 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson