Skip to comments.
USAF To Arm B-2A With Massive Bunker-Buster Bomb
Flight International ^
| June 9, 2009
| By Stephen Trimble
Posted on 06/16/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT by Fennie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
06/16/2009 4:19:07 PM PDT
by
Fennie
To: Fennie
2
posted on
06/16/2009 4:23:23 PM PDT
by
rahbert
(The rule of law is the foundation of our freedom..)
To: Fennie
Hmmm what upgrades are in the pipe to the B2 to make it a B2-A model ?
3
posted on
06/16/2009 4:23:51 PM PDT
by
tophat9000
( We are "O" so f---ed)
To: Lil'freeper; big'ol_freeper; SLB
Well at least the LSI can build a big bomb!
4
posted on
06/16/2009 4:24:16 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(People who do things are people that get things done.)
To: Fennie
5
posted on
06/16/2009 4:24:21 PM PDT
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: tophat9000
Modify the bomb bay for a MOP?
6
posted on
06/16/2009 4:26:22 PM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 148 of our national holiday from reality.)
To: Fennie
Give some to Israel and have them run tests in Iran.
7
posted on
06/16/2009 4:26:59 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
To: Fennie
much more info. here.
< http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/dshtw.htm >
8
posted on
06/16/2009 4:27:57 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(When you put Democrats in charge, stupid / deadly things happen... :^)
To: beethovenfan
I assume these are for destroying the “compounds” of right wing militia in potentially secessionary states?
To: Fennie
I wonder it they have orders to go after Levin in his bunker?
10
posted on
06/16/2009 4:37:40 PM PDT
by
GreyFriar
(Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
To: Fennie
Isn’t a daisy cutter 5000 lbs? and this is 6 times greater?
whoa.
lol!
11
posted on
06/16/2009 5:07:40 PM PDT
by
Finalapproach29er
(A woman will be the next President; I hope it's Palin instead of HRC.)
To: tophat9000
The first model in an aircraft series is the A model. Any future upgrades could result in a B-2B.
12
posted on
06/16/2009 5:35:14 PM PDT
by
ops33
(Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
To: beethovenfan
I understand your zeal, but if you give advanced military equipment to Israel, somehow the Chinese build a knockoff in a half dozen years.
13
posted on
06/16/2009 6:31:18 PM PDT
by
GAB-1955
(I write books, love my wife, serve my nation, and believe in the Resurrection.)
Why bother? The B-2A is so weather-sensitive, fragile, and expensive that it’ll never be deployed to any hemispehere that contains a bunker that needs busting.
14
posted on
06/16/2009 7:50:29 PM PDT
by
flowerplough
(Bammy = Oprah = Clinton = most elected Democrats, successfully feigning compassion for money&power)
To: ops33
"The first model in an aircraft series is the A model. Any future upgrades could result in a B-2B." You learn something new everyday. With personal weapons systems it's a little different. A alpha-designator after the model name, would indicate some kind of variant. ie. M16, M16A1, M16a2 or M1911, M1911A1
To: Finalapproach29er
Isn’t a daisy cutter 5000 lbs? and this is 6 times greater? Let's have a little bit of economy here! (I oppose government waste!)
Look, in a confined space, you don't get much more bang for your buck from sizing up your gross bang level, since you get so much unpleasantness from the initial, entry-level sort of bang, like a 750-pound bomb. One of those going off in an Iranian supersecret weapons lab would pretty well spoil everyone's day already.
So what happens if you take a garden-variety daisy-cutter, suitably accessorized to play an authentic period Jimi Hendrix guitar solo on the way down, screw several segments of a space-shuttle SRB onto its ass end programmed to ignite during descent, and see what that'll penetrate, break, and generally spoil? Bet it wouldn't leave much to MOP up.
To: flowerplough
The B-2A is so weather-sensitive, fragile, and expensive that itll never be deployed to any hemispehere that contains a bunker that needs busting. The B-2 has been deployed to every bomber base in the USAF inventory. One even crashed off Guam. Birds, I think. The B-2 has been used extensively over Iraq and Afghanistan.
17
posted on
06/17/2009 2:41:35 AM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: jimtorr
But the stealth bomber’s RAM coating is quite delicate like glass, unlike the Raptor’s durable and robust RAM coating, which can even take acid rain.
18
posted on
06/17/2009 4:23:35 AM PDT
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: jimtorr
The B-2 has been deployed to every bomber base... used extensively over Iraq and Afghanistan
If you say so... This is the kind of stuff I've been reading about the B-2 for years:
The most expensive aircraft ever, each of the 21 B-2s costs over $2 billion (development and construction costs combined). The 170 ton aircraft can carry 22 tons of bombs. There's not a big need for the B-2 at the moment, as the older B-1s and B-52s can deliver bombs cheaper, and just as reliably. Smart bombs have greatly reduced the need for heavy bombers, since one smart bomb ... (http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htatrit/articles/20080428.aspx?comments=Y)
And "The Buff (B-52) fleet's cumulative mission capable rate from March 2000 through March 2001 was 80.5 percent, said Air Combat Command officials. The B-1 Lancer's rate was 53.7 percent and the B-2 Spirit's 30.3. (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0IBP/is_6_45/ai_77106313/)
19
posted on
06/17/2009 4:56:18 AM PDT
by
flowerplough
(Bammy = Oprah = Clinton = most elected Democrats, successfully feigning compassion for money&power)
To: Finalapproach29er
The BLU-82 Daisy Cutter is 15,000lbs if I remember correctly. The explosives account for 12,600lbs.
It’s replacement is the GBU-43 MOAB. That’s 22,000lbs with 18,000 of it being explosives. Unlike the unguided Daisy Cutter, the MOAB is GPS guided.
The MOP (GBU-57) is 30,000lbs with a 6,000lb warhead. The previous large bunker buster was the GBU-28 which was about 5,000lbs with a 600lb warhead.
20
posted on
06/17/2009 5:05:52 AM PDT
by
OA5599
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson