Replies

==How is it anti-God or anti-design to attempt to tie together quantum physics and general relativity into a single consistent mathematical theory/model? That’s all string theory is. That’s about as anti-God/anti-design as Newton explaining the moon’s orbit and falling apples into a single theory.

According Leonard Susskind, widely considered by string theorists to be the father of string theory, without string theory “...we would be left with no other rational explanation for the illusion of a designed universe.”

Just like the Darwinists insist that Biology is the study of complicated things that give the illusion of having been designed for a purpose, or the modern big bangers claim that our universe gives off the illusion of having been designed for a purpose, or the string theorists who attempt to come up with a mathematical theory of everything to escape design and purpose, it’s all just an attempt by the enemies of God to banish Him from His own creation. This has been admitted by Darwinists such as Dawkins, Hawking et al with respect to the big bang, and Susskind has let the cat out of the bag with respect to string theory. And yet, somehow these practitioners of materialist religion get to call their nature worship “science.”

"And yet, somehow these practitioners of materialist religion get to call their nature worship 'science.'"

These individuals criticize the church for what it did in the past, yet they are doing the exact same thing with their own stupid religion now. I believe history will reveal these phonies for what they are, and this era of science will be remembered as being ruled by the God haters. May their reign end swiftly.

And yet, somehow these practitioners of materialist religion get to call their nature worship “science.”

The motivation behind science doesn't change the nature of science. Science is the effort to discover, and increase human understanding of how the physical world works.

As I linked to before, string theory is showing promise with super fluids. To say that string theory isn't science because you don't like the philosophy or motivation behind its development is childish, petty, and doesn't help your cause.

And yet, somehow these practitioners of materialist religion get to call their nature worship “science.”

Yup....moreover, they also blabber endless noise about "repeatable, verifiable, predictable" when demanding creationists "prove" their theory, meanwhile turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to their ilk when it comes to string and multiverse theory.

As I've said before, if the people with so many multiple hang-ups with God shrieked a fraction about global warming, and various nonsense that actually DOES harm science, they'd maybe have a shred of legitimacy.

But they don't.

Basic reality seems to be that string theory is meant to provide enough universes to get past the problems which evolution has with basic probabilities, and evolution is perceived as necessary to prevent puritanical redneck Christians from outlawing sex. The whole thing is about sex.