Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration to keep secret 44 coal ash sites that pose threat to people nearby
New York Newsday / The Associated Press ^ | June 12, 2009 | Dina Cappiello

Posted on 06/12/2009 2:34:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

The Obama administration has decided to keep secret the locations of nearly four dozen coal ash storage sites that pose a threat to people living nearby.

The Environmental Protection Agency classified the 44 sites as potential hazards to communities while investigating coal ash waste storage sites after a spill at a Tennessee power plant in December. The classification means the waste sites could cause death and significant property damage if an event such as a storm, a terrorist attack or a structural failure caused them to leak into surrounding communities.

The sites have existed for years with little or no federal regulation.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho44; coal; energy; environment; epa; obama; terrorism; wot
Now just imagine either President Bush, Reagan or ANY other Republican administration doing this: You'd never hear the end of it. Bet this won't have any legs at all...
1 posted on 06/12/2009 2:34:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

ashes, shmashes...if these were old Prisoner photos the Democrats would be chomping at the bit to reveal them...


2 posted on 06/12/2009 2:37:05 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Stout Hearts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If any Conservative President had done this, you would be hearing investigation panels and congress inquiries by the dozen.


3 posted on 06/12/2009 2:37:40 PM PDT by Ancient Drive (will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

And what about transparency, and their penchant for disclosing classified information about terrorist detainees???

What about this Barack? Isn’t this an example of YOUR administration not living up to our highest ideals?????


4 posted on 06/12/2009 2:38:13 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

that’s pretty “transparent” isn’t it? ;-)


5 posted on 06/12/2009 2:42:51 PM PDT by Clarence (back to lurking now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
This he keeps secret but our nuclear fuel depots he publishes on the Internet!
6 posted on 06/12/2009 3:00:12 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
What?

Coal Ash Research Center

1993 EPA issued its final regulatory determination and continued to exempt coal ash from regulation as hazardous waste.

7 posted on 06/12/2009 3:46:38 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So what is Newsday and the AP talking about?

Coal Ash Utilization

The environmental compatibility, abundance, availability, and economy of CCBs translate into benefits for industry. Industries benefit through significant cost savings without sacrificing product quality. In fact, the properties of CCBs are such that, in many applications, they improve the product. In engineering construction materials, coal ash can add value and enhance strength and durability while reducing cost. In agricultural applications, gypsum-rich products can provide plant nutrients and improve the tilth of depleted soils over large areas of the country. In waste stabilization, the cementitious and pozzolanic properties of these products can immobilize hazardous nuclear, organic, and toxic metal wastes for safe and effective environmental disposal.

8 posted on 06/12/2009 3:50:52 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

What happened to the ‘O’BOZO promise of transparancy? Oh.. that was ‘OBOZinno talking.


9 posted on 06/12/2009 3:52:45 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone should file a FOIA request.


10 posted on 06/12/2009 3:53:38 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All

Coal ashes are a significant source of radioactivity. See http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html.


11 posted on 06/12/2009 5:17:11 PM PDT by FrogBurger (Always compare news articles from different sources. When they fully agree, you can be sure it's BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrogBurger

See post 8.


12 posted on 06/12/2009 5:36:23 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; 2ndDivisionVet

Figure 1 displays the frequency
distribution of uranium concentration for approximately
2,000 coal samples from the Western United States and
approximately 300 coals from the Illinois Basin. In the
majority of samples, concentrations of uranium fall in
the range from slightly below 1 to 4 parts per million
(ppm). Similar uranium concentrations are found in a variety
of common rocks and soils, as indicated in figure 2.
Coals with more than 20 ppm uranium are rare in the United
States. Thorium concentrations in coal fall within a similar
1–4 ppm range, compared to an average crustal abundance
of approximately 10 ppm. Coals with more than 20 ppm
thorium are extremely rare.
http://acaa.affiniscape.com/associations/8003/files/FS-163-97.pdf

also see
http://acaa.affiniscape.com/displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=5#Q9

Studies conducted by the University of North Dakota indicate that for most heavy metals, even if released directly into groundwater, the concentrations are so low that they would not adversely affect drinking water quality. A U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) fact sheet states that a “Standardized test of the leach ability of toxic trace elements such as arsenic, selenium, lead and mercury from fly ash shows that the amounts dissolved are sufficiently low to justify regulatory classification of fly ash as non-hazardous solid waste.”


13 posted on 06/12/2009 5:39:50 PM PDT by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueplum
Thanks. Hubby remembers the ash being used to pave driveways when we were kids. One has to wonder what in the world is going on here. Unless they made slurry out of it to store it. That could be a problem.

Coal Ash Slurry Pond Bursts in Tennessee

14 posted on 06/12/2009 5:50:49 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FrogBurger

I wish someone would’ve told us that here in the hardcoal region, we could’ve bottled it.


15 posted on 06/12/2009 7:32:23 PM PDT by RedwM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson