Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody

If born on US soil, a citizen, but you cannot extrapolate he would be eligible as a natural born citizen because the issue must have SCOTUS clarification before the issue can be settled based upon the Founders’ intent with the phrase ‘natural born citizen.’


115 posted on 06/10/2009 9:12:37 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
If born on US soil, a citizen, but you cannot extrapolate he would be eligible as a natural born citizen because the issue must have SCOTUS clarification before the issue can be settled based upon the Founders’ intent with the phrase ‘natural born citizen.’

Someone will have to bring a case, they'll take, then, and persuade them to carve out a third category of citizen. For now, there are only two kinds of citizen: natural born and naturalized. And a kid who is a citizen via the 14th Amendment is clearly not in the second category. It's not looking like it's in the cards this time around.

Actually, it would probably take another amendment, probably aimed at solving the anchor baby problem, which the 14th has caused. If such an amendment were properly written, it could also define citizenship for purposes of presidential eligibility. But then, you'd have to get it passed.

121 posted on 06/10/2009 9:26:15 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson