Somebody’s hypothesis was shown to be incorrect by an experiment. Well that proves it the entire scientific method is flawed!
It is very sad when the opening statement of this article is incorrect.
I do not know which is worse, that the author does not know the difference between Abiogeneis and The Evolutionary Theory, or that he would knowingly create a falsehood.
While the origins of life are a question of interest to evolutionary biologist and frequently studied in conjunction with researchers from other fields such as geochemistry and organic chemistry, the core of evolutionary theory itself does not rest on a foundation that requires any knowledge about the origins of life on earth
Setting up the straw man. The usual creationist tactic of misdirection, next is going to come the name-calling,
So I might as well give you a chance to complete the trifecta by providing a question to avoid.
Name a gene that shows no sign of an evolutionary origin.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkED8cWRu4Q&feature=player_embedded
All of Adam's, all of Eve's, etc.
“The usual creationist tactic of misdirection, next is going to come the name-calling”
You accuse others of what you do in your reply. Look in the mirror about straw men and falsehood and questions avoided.
Of course I really don't expect any self examination of just what you're saying in this last reply. Accusing creationists of dishonesty and ignorance probably keeps you busy.