Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
Two SIGNIFICANT faults with the Panspermia idea:

1. TIME. Not enough of it. Calculate the subliminal speeds those rocks travel, and you'll find they're still far too slow to make it around the galaxy. Additionally, they've had to GET VERY LUCKY and "find" a planet to capture it/crash into. Infintessimally infintessimal odds of that, and, of course, not nearly enough time.

2. Logical fallacy of BEGGING THE QUESTION. Where did the first life come from? It wasn't seeded. Because of (1) and (2), it's far more logical to conclude that life arose here on Earth, by some means, Divine or...?

47 posted on 06/08/2009 1:07:45 PM PDT by sauron ("Truth is hate to those who hate Truth" --unknown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: sauron
Gee whiz, what to say ~ panspermia is an hypothesis. Once we recognize "examples" we'll find out. In the meantime compared to Creo, we have a good chance of finding "examples" ~ a "test of the hypothesis", and compared to Evo, we have a good chance of seeing exactly that happen ~ again, a laboratory test.

As far as needing to go all the way around the Galaxy, how about within 30 light years of Earth? Plenty of stuff there eh!

50 posted on 06/08/2009 3:06:26 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson