Well then evolution would not be nearly as debatable if all science would separate their hopefuls ideas from what can actually be proven scientifically. I concur it would be nice to keep them separate, however I was responding to another poster who thought it necessary to mix the two w/ hopes and dreams regarding achaeobacteria.
Personally the best site I’ve encountered for separating the 2 is creationscience.com
Science doesn’t prove—it draws logical, rational conclusions from available evidence. Creation rationalization begins with a conclusion and puts forth ridiculous explanations derived from scripture and other anecdotes to support the conclusion. It is directed to buttress the faith of otherwise weak Christian.
creationscience.com is as embarrassing to real Christians as the rest.
Evolution and Christianity coexist beautifully, except for the weak in faith.