Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KrisKrinkle
WIJG: Quite obviously, you believe the "union" to be something other than a political union.

KK: I never thought about it one way or the other considering the term “political union”.

By all means, please enlighten us - is the union of American States "political," or is it something that is not "political?"

Please answer that simple question. If you suggest that the "union" is something other than "political," please also reference the specific legal grounds upon which that "union" was maintained by federal military force (circa 1861-1865), and advise us why those legal grounds are not also "political" in nature.

In all honesty, you don't seem to have "thought about" much of any thing, based on your posts...

517 posted on 06/25/2009 3:36:02 PM PDT by Who is John Galt? ("Sometimes I have to break the law in order to meet my management objectives." - Bill Calkins, BLM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?

WIJG: Quite obviously, you believe the "union" to be something other than a political union.

KK: I never thought about it one way or the other considering the term “political union”.

WIJG: By all means, please enlighten us - is the union of American States "political," or is it something that is not "political?"

I wrote:  “I never thought about it one way or the other considering the term “political union” and all of a sudden you put it on me to “enlighten” everybody about something I had not thought about one way or the other using your term?

Since you’re the one who brought the “political union” thing up (in response to my “A new government but not a new Union.”), why don’t youenlighten us - is the union of American States "political," or is it something that is not "political?"  Not that I’m all that interested because from my point of view you’re just using a weak arguing technique, diverting the discussion from the main line (is the Union continuous or did one Union end and a new Union begin with the Constitution) to a new area in which you think you can dominate.

In all honesty, you don't seem to have "thought about" much of any thing, based on your posts...

Another weak arguing technique: insult and ridicule.  Also a technique used in the pseudo Delphi process for reaching consensus (as opposed to the legitimate Delphi process).  And a technique used by some in authority to show “who the boss is”.

 


522 posted on 06/25/2009 8:17:02 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 517 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson