Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Question_Assumptions

Its probably because Lee fought very valiantly, ultimately failed, and then retired gracefully (becoming I believe, a surprisingly effective educator).

Grant OTOH, fought very valiantly, won by a cynical if effective process of attrition, and then went into politics, which is a surefire way to get folk riled up at you at the best of times. He was a great general, but not a particularly successful president, and as he did the latter after the former, he tended to get remembered for his failures as POTUS rather than his successes as General of all the armies.


36 posted on 06/06/2009 3:27:15 PM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Vanders9

Yet despite being a mediocre if not failure as President, there is still ample evidence that he was remembered fondly not only before but also after his death. He wouldn’t be on the $50 if he was really as bad as, say, Jimmy Carter.


80 posted on 06/06/2009 4:02:28 PM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson