[kellynla]

“Mr. Caliente?”

the man’s name is “Celente”

“I see very little analysis in this article?”

Then I suggest you read it again. Although I can understand why you didn’t “see very little analysis in this article” since you didn’t even get his name right. LOL

[nathanbedford]

I apologize for the typo resulting from a problem with my voice recognition software. Why do you find it funny that I misspelled his name? Why is that funny? Why does that demonstrate to you that I did not read the article?

In fact I did read his article and I stand by my assessment. It is not an analysis it is sophistry. I say this even though I made it clear that I'm predisposed to agree with him. I'm not challenging his conclusion but his scholarship.

[blam]

I read this long report from Jim Rogers last night. His conclusions are not much different than Celentes'.

Fund Managers Can Become Farmers: Jim Rogers