Replies

Yes, thank you very much. While I don’t subscribe that everything on the list may necessarily be true (as all reasoning of man is subject to flaws), I do see there is ample evidence that “Scientists” are largely ignorant of natural laws around them. Hence, we have “theories.” And yes, I understand the difference in the term theory as it applies to science.

However, when all is said and done, while we have come a long way, I think when we meet our maker, and all is revealed in His own due time and pleasure, so many pompous and proud “scientists” and outright liars and deceivers will look more foolish then than do bloodletters and alchemists look to us now. Even a period of 100 years causes so many paradigm shifts, I take all “science” related to age of earth with a grain of salt.

I personally do not believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old, but that it has been about that much time since the fall. I also do not know that our term we use for “days” is consistent with the use of time utilized by God, as He has stated “Behold I come quickly.” While true, it does not obviously match with our concept of time, as He is infallible.

Still, I know of no record that indicates the time between Adam/Eve’s creation and that of the fall, so I do not know the period of time between the creation and fall. Therefore, I have no problem accepting that the Earth is older than 6,000 years, yet far younger than man’s notions. I also have no problem accepting an old earth, but with a growing human population (after the fall) only having been around a short time.

Hope that can be insightful to anyone.