The vast amounts of scientific research on effects of tobacco smoke is already published. All the hard science (experiments) facts agree on its beneficial effects (check the references and debate in the threads linked earlier) while the antismoking con men have only their junk science (statistical associations on non-randomized samples) to parrot ever since Hitler initiated this modern day "scientific" antismoking hysteria. I am merely pointing out the research already out there, which was sponsored and conducted by the antismoking interests (not that they'll ever tell you about it; you've got to dig out their papers and read them by yourself).
Now stop being so irresponsible.
Who the heck are you to advice me or anyone else on anything. You seem much too ignorant on the subject to be a even mere pharma shill, let alone an expert.
And speaking of losing the debate, what's that rule about mentioning Hitler?