To: Kansas58
Until such time as anarchy prevails, this is not the right behavior.
Shooting causes more shooting.
19 posted on
05/31/2009 9:41:36 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
("We beat the Soviet Union, then we became them." -- Lazamataz, 2005)
To: Lazamataz
Shooting causes more shooting. Murder has a tendency to boomerang on the murderer. Today is an example.
26 posted on
05/31/2009 9:43:03 AM PDT by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: Lazamataz
>Shooting causes more shooting...
In a revolution, that would be the goal.
79 posted on
05/31/2009 9:51:40 AM PDT by
bill1952
(Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
To: Lazamataz
Thank you! This is certainly not the right behavior. It is the behavior of extremists who are just as bad as the terrorists we are fighting. I wonder if they will ever learn that morals cannot be legislated, and start putting the time and effort into TEACHING MORAL VALUES. More lives will be saved. Simply follow the example of the greatest teacher who walked the earth 2000 years ago.
104 posted on
05/31/2009 9:56:31 AM PDT by
flash2368
(Scary Times)
To: Lazamataz
Agree. Murdering someone because they are murdering others makes the perp no better than the scumbag he/she killed. The perp acted as a zealot.
117 posted on
05/31/2009 10:00:10 AM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
([Advocate for] Mitt Romney[?], God help you, but you're on the wrong website ~ Jim Robinson)
To: Lazamataz
Until such time as anarchy prevails, this is not the right behavior.Amen here too.
150 posted on
05/31/2009 10:06:20 AM PDT by
houeto
(Defang the FEDGOV. Repeal the 17th!)
To: Lazamataz; Alamo-Girl; hosepipe; wagglebee; metmom
Until such time as anarchy prevails, this is not the right behavior. Shooting causes more shooting. Jeepers, Lazamataz, but from where I sit, it looks pretty clear to me that anarchy already does prevail. A major part of the problem is that most people nowadays cannot tell the difference between what is (allegedly) "lawful" and what justice requires.
Just because outright, objective infanticide has been "legalized" (e.g., late-term abortion, refusal to protect born-alive infants), are we then required to say that infanticide is "just?"
When the law no longer serves justice, then it seems pretty clear to me that a state of de facto anarchy already exists. JMHO FWIW.
330 posted on
05/31/2009 10:39:01 AM PDT by
betty boop
(Tyranny is always whimsical. — Mark Steyn)
To: Lazamataz
So we are to hold off on the gunfire until anarchy prevails?
When do you think that will happen?
535 posted on
05/31/2009 11:17:07 AM PDT by
JRochelle
("I wasn't briefed about the briefing, I was only informed." SanFranNan.)
To: Lazamataz
Well said Laz
This is not the way prolife people should act
999 posted on
05/31/2009 2:18:39 PM PDT by
Rightly Biased
(We are all equal here but some of us are more equal than others.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson