Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN fades in prime-time picture (Dinosaur Media DeathWatchâ„¢)
Politico.com ^ | May 30, 2009 | Michael Calderone

Posted on 05/31/2009 5:02:41 AM PDT by abb

On day one, CNN ruled cable news.

But while viewers may flock to the network for election day or the Inauguration, day 130 is a different story.

CNN, which just took home a Peabody Award for its 2008 election coverage, and dominated cable-news ratings on days when politics took center stage, is having trouble getting those viewers back on other nights.

Since Obama took office, CNN’s prime-time audience has dropped sharply, raising doubts about whether the network’s middle-of-the-road strategy can be effective against more opinionated programming on Fox News and MSNBC.

CNN President Jon Klein is quick to brush aside concerns about specific ratings metrics, and chatter online about the network’s prime-time decline.

Klein, who last year trumpeted CNN’s quarterly win over Fox News in prime-time viewers in the 25-54 demographic preferred by advertisers, now maintains that the nightly block is just a fraction of the daily schedule, and that his network remains committed first and foremost to high-quality journalism.

“It’s the oldest trick in the book to trot out over-the-top hosts and put them on a cable-news show,” Klein said.

Klein pointed out that "Anderson Cooper 360" is beating "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" at 10 p.m. — but of course, that’s the repeat of the 8 p.m. airing of Olbermann's MSNBC show. And while year-to-date, Cooper maintains a sizable lead, he hasn't been winning by nearly as much lately.

It's Cooper’s ratings that are the most troubling, say staffers, given the resources and heavy promotion for his show, and persona. For years, Klein has talked up Cooper, once famously dubbing him “the anti-anchor” and, in the aftermath of Katrina, as “a reporter [who’s] got that magical something.

But that magic may be wearing off.

Cooper dropped from 1.4 million viewers in January to 1.06 million in April, according to Nielsen. And that trend will continue in May: Cooper has yet to crack 1 million viewers this month, and even fell as low as a half-million one evening. Also while "360" is ahead of “Countdown,” the Olbermann repeat wins the 25-54 demo about half the time.

Still, looking at the entire year, CNN maintains that Cooper's having his best performance in both total viewers and the demo, again excluding the 2008 election year.

And at 8 p.m., Campbell Brown’s “No Bias. No Bull” — with Roland Martin recently filling in during the host’s maternity leave — has also dropped in recent months.

While averaging 1.26 million viewers in January, according to Nielsen, Brown’s show brought in just an average of just 786,000 in April. And that number is expected to drop again in May, given that the audience on several nights this month fell below 500,000.

Klein acknowledged the recent decline, but said it indicated that the audience missed Brown while away. Whether viewers return should be apparent soon enough: Brown’s back at the anchor desk on Monday night, and the show tapped a new executive producer, Janelle Rodriguez.

Current and former CNN staffers, though, say there’s definite concern inside about how Cooper and Brown are faring against the competition.

Brown’s show has been billed as the antidote to Fox’s “The O’Reilly Factor” — which continues to gain viewers post-Inauguration — and Olbermann. But her show's lack of traction begs the question of whether there's a way to bring in ratings without the ideologically slanted hosts that have pulled in partisan viewers on the left and right.

And while being “nonpartisan” is something most journalists strive for — and staffers there stressed that ratings aren’t as important as remaining committed to quality journalism — there’s also a perception of being stuck, in one's words, in “the murky middle.”

“We don’t wake up in the morning with an ideological focus the way the other two clearly do,” the CNN staffer said, in praising the network’s approach.

“However,” the staffer added, “many of us are unhappy we’re not doing well.”

While Fox News dominates the cable competition — with an audience last month the size of the other two networks combined — CNN had at least been able to claim the No. 2 spot.

But in March, MSNBC overtook CNN for the first time in both total prime-time viewers and the 25-54 demographic. CNN narrowly edged MSNBC in total viewers in April, but again lost the demo.

CNN executives point out that looking year-to-date, the network still leads MSNBC in total prime-time viewers. The competition, however, is focused on more recent trends.

“We’re on track to beat CNN in prime-time for the third month in a row,” said MSNBC spokesperson Jeremy Gaines. “That firmly establishes us as the No. 2 cable-news channel in prime-time.” It’s not as if MSNBC’s nightly numbers have been rising like Fox’s during the first few months of the Obama administration; rather, both Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow have watched their post-Inauguration numbers soften.

But when it comes to the prime-time metrics on which the industry focuses, MSNBC now has bragging rights. So in the afterglow of the March numbers, MSNBC President Phil Griffin took a shot across the bow at CNN.

“What do they stand for?" Griffin told The Associated Press. "That's their biggest challenge. CNN ain't what it used to be, and that has given us an opening because we stand for something and they don't."

That’s not how Klein sees it.

“People around the world, and here in the United States, trust CNN for reliable information more than any other news organization,” he said. “We are focused on re-earning that trust every day.”

Klein is quick to pull out metrics of his own that emphasize CNN’s overall strength, such as beating MSNBC handily during in total day viewers — by 54 percent since January, according to the network. There’s also been gains by sister-network HLN — formerly Headline News — which even tops CNN in prime-time on many nights. And if you look at May’s numbers, he said, CNN doing its best in the ratings since 2003, excluding the 2008 election year.

“The audience is becoming increasingly accustomed to finding opinions in prime-time,” said Tom Rosenstiel, director of Pew’s Project for Excellence in Journalism.

While CNN has a larger pool of viewers who sometimes tune in, evident during major news events, Rosenstiel said, “The O’Reilly Factor” is an appointment show with a more loyal nightly following. (Indeed, O’Reilly can bring in four to five times the audience on some nights). “CNN excels," he said, in covering big news stories like the Iraq war or Hurricane Katrina.

Or take election night, when CNN brought in nearly 12.3 million total viewers on, which not only easily beat MSNBC and Fox — with 5.88 and 5.13 million, respectively — combined, but also topped both NBC and CBS.

Such numbers indicate that at times viewers head straight to CNN for the Five W’s of journalism — who, what, when, where and why — giving credence to the network mantra of being “the most trusted name in news.”

And there’s a certain irony in all the hand-wringing because a news network decides upon taking a less ideological approach to the news in prime-time. In the 1990’s, CNN couldn’t shake the “Clinton News Network” nickname among conservatives, and yet now, is viewed as the more moderate network given MSNBC’s prime-time lurch to the left.

John King, host of Sunday’s “State of the Union,” said that there doesn’t have to be an either/or scenario in prime-time programming: CNN can offer compelling programs with news and analysis, while leaving the partisan fights to the guests.

“The person in that chair, even though they were just steering a provocative, spicy conversation, is a serious, objective journalist,” King said of the prime-time hosts. So if there’s a breaking news event, he continued, “you will not have to change the channel.”

King added that if there’s crisis occurs a world away, CNN is better positioned than any cable or broadcast company to cover the story. And beyond just foreign affairs, King rattled off a laundry list of domestic issues the Obama administration will confront, such as the economy, health care, education and most recently, the Supreme Court confirmation process.

“I will take my brand over any other brand in the world as we go down this road,” King said. "[Viewers] want information. They don’t just want volume.”


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: advertising; cndw; cnn; dbm; television
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: CivilWarguy

CNN is not middle of the road. None of them are. The reason they use that term to describe CNN is because the left do not see themselves as, “the left.” They think there is a right wing and everybody else. No left wing


21 posted on 05/31/2009 5:33:48 AM PDT by lakertaker (Libertarian Party since 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BerniesFriend
The common denominator of so called news organizations that loose ratings / advertisers, is that the more left they lean, the more they have to "earn" that trust back.
22 posted on 05/31/2009 5:35:31 AM PDT by reefdiver (So how's that HOPE & CHANGE working out for ya ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: abb

To suggest that CNN is middle of the road is to believe that O loves America, Israel, and the Queen of England.


23 posted on 05/31/2009 5:35:44 AM PDT by Carley (OBAMA IS A MALEVOLENT FORCE IN THE WORLD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

CNN International is more biased than Al-Jazerra.


24 posted on 05/31/2009 5:48:21 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

CNN... you mean the channel where just last night on Wolfie’s show Christiane Amanpour breathlessly spoke about the “massive civilian deaths” caused by American missile attacks?

They might be ‘middle of the road’ but the road appears to be heading to Mecca.


25 posted on 05/31/2009 5:50:40 AM PDT by frankenMonkey (www.citizendirect.org - this domain name for sale)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankenMonkey

I still have trouble knowing why Fox is so successful when at the ballot box, we lose.

Fox has gotten tabloid so bad I can hardly watch it,,is the success the tabloid factor?

There is no good news on anymore. I barely watch. If Brit Hume were on I would watch every night.


26 posted on 05/31/2009 5:55:48 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
Since Obama took office, CNN’s prime-time audience has dropped sharply, raising doubts about whether the network’s middle-of-the-road strategy can be effective against more opinionated programming on Fox News and MSNBC.

____________________________________________-

Middle of the road? You are lucky if the GOP gets a kind word. CNN treats the GOP like an ex-spouse that cheated on you and took your house, your kids, your 401k and your dog in the settlement.

27 posted on 05/31/2009 5:56:57 AM PDT by Plumres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: abb

“Middle of the road?”

Teabagger Cooper, L King, Cam Brown, Rotund Roland Martin, Gasbag Gergen, Toobin, Schneider, The Kook on Blitzer, Begala, Carville... Etc.

Real middle of the road.

The only semi conservative I can think of is Lou Dobbs/


28 posted on 05/31/2009 5:59:16 AM PDT by nhwingut ( Don't Blame Me. I Voted For Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Middle of the road programming at cnn?Politico must be smoking some real radical sh!t.


29 posted on 05/31/2009 6:02:16 AM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Life is tough.It's even tougher when you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
the network’s middle-of-the-road strategy

[sarcastic eye roll]

Klein pointed out that "Anderson Cooper 360" is beating "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" at 10 p.m.

Guess the audience liked Cooper's "teabagger" jokes better than Olbermann's.

there’s also a perception of being stuck, in one's words, in “the murky middle.”

I would say CNN is soft left, FOX is soft right, and MSNBC is KOS left.

30 posted on 05/31/2009 6:11:39 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Back in the day, the environmental Left consciously set out to mainstream (verb) groups like the Sierra Club by creating and publicizing the more radical groups like Earth First. Doing so made the Sierra Club look centrist and respectable, even staid. It worked, and the left considers this to have been a very successful strategy.

I see the same thing going on with MSNBC and CNN. They are too competitive for it to be an agreed-to strategy but the effect is similar. Olbermann makes Cooper look like Cronkite.

I think it would cool if some deep-pocketed conservative got all strategeristical and created a truly right wing network to shift the perceived center point rightward. Then FOX would be one of the two “centrist” networks with CNN. In fact, with four networks there would be no true center as with three.


31 posted on 05/31/2009 6:46:18 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarguy
The Politico is a liberal rag. I remember when CNN had an order in the late 90's from its execs to no longer use the term "scandal" when referring to the Klinton legal troubles. The same CNN that allowed George Steponallus to call into Larry King's show and ambush George Bush in 1992. The same CNN that allowed known DNC operatives to pose as "moderates" and ambush Republican candidates in the 2008 election.

Its not the hateful MSNBC, but its not middle of the road.

32 posted on 05/31/2009 7:01:16 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: imahawk
Middle of the road programming at cnn?Politico must be smoking some real radical sh!t.
The dinomedia deadenders behind Politico brought their standard issue journalism bias with them from the WaPo. Politico also profited heavily from Obama political ads.

Politico now spends its profit trying establish itself as the new media authority on the Potomac. They want to be everybody's "go to" guys when it comes to understanding government. "Thought leaders" to help the governed get their mind right.

Politico's stories stink just enough to earn frequent shout outs from Matt Drudge. The two neo powers that be resonate with each other. Each day toiling mightily to turn molehills into mountains by growing whispered rumor into full blown scandal. LOL.

The popularity of Politico sourced stories on FR indicates success thus far.
33 posted on 05/31/2009 7:03:41 AM PDT by Milhous (Confusion to our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: abb
We used to watch CNN all the time. But then they statrted showing commercials during all the Movies and that was that.

Wait... that was AMC.
Never mind.

/s

34 posted on 05/31/2009 7:09:14 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

One factor that was not mentioned but has affected the Fox vs. CNN ratings is the late arrival at Fox of true HD programming. Fox was basically faking it last year during the election cycle and even I, a loyal Freeper for sure, was turning to CNN for election coverage. CNN was way ahead of Fox technically until just a few months ago. But that advantage is gone and with it some number of viewers who instinctively prefer Fox programming. HD is in about 25% of homes these days and they are likely to be in homes with satellite or cable access so the impact of the Fox upgrade to true HD programming was an important factor. At least IMHO.


35 posted on 05/31/2009 7:12:54 AM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
The road to success in the media (radio, cable or print) is to become "Howard Stern" outrageous.
Just being soft left or right when there are no compelling news stories is not going to cut it with todays mind numbed, largely ADD or ADHD undereducated masses.
Look at who is successful on the radio or cable and you see the winning formula.
Get outrageous, whether left, right, center or over-the-top and people will watch or listen. - IMHO
36 posted on 05/31/2009 7:21:00 AM PDT by Riodacat (Legum servi sumus ut liberi esse possimus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb


37 posted on 05/31/2009 7:27:04 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - Obama is basically Jim Jones with a teleprompter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
"...and that his network remains committed first and foremost to high-quality journalism."

They're in deep doo-doo. They don't do high-quality journalism. They're not middle of the road. They do inside the beltway conventional wisdom.

There's no market for inside the beltway conventional wisdom. There was no market for Nero's music, while Rome burned.

38 posted on 05/31/2009 7:50:55 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Are they insane, stupid or just evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Thanks for the ping.


39 posted on 05/31/2009 8:05:03 AM PDT by GOPJ (To a community organizer, every citizen looks like a victim entitled to someone else's money-Philbin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
I still have trouble knowing why Fox is so successful when at the ballot box, we lose. Conservatives like knowing what is going on. Libtards like music. Fox is left of center as proven by a Berkly Professor some years back when he set out to prove how right wing Fox was, but it is the only game in town. What really surprised him was how left wing everyone else was. Sorry that I don't remember the name of the man but it was posted on FR at the time. Perhaps another FReeper could help? We loose at the ballot box because too many ignorant people vote.
40 posted on 05/31/2009 8:55:13 AM PDT by Nuc1 (NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson