Posted on 05/29/2009 10:19:03 AM PDT by cycle of discernment
Ted Rall: It’s increasingly evident that Obama should resign
May 28, 2009
by Ted Rall
We expected broken promises. But the gap between the soaring expectations that accompanied Barack Obama's inauguration and his wretched performance is the broadest such chasm in recent historical memory. This guy makes Bill Clinton look like a paragon of integrity and follow-through.
From healthcare to torture to the economy to war, Obama has reneged on pledges real and implied. So timid and so owned is he that he trembles in fear of offending, of all things, the government of Turkey. Obama has officially reneged on his campaign promise to acknowledge the Armenian genocide. When a president doesn't have the 'nads to annoy the Turks, why does he bother to show up for work in the morning?
Obama is useless. Worse than that, he's dangerous. Which is why, if he has any patriotism left after the thousands of meetings he has sat through with corporate contributors, blood-sucking lobbyists and corrupt politicians, he ought to step down now--before he drags us further into the abyss.
I refer here to Obama's plan for "preventive detentions." If a cop or other government official thinks you might want to commit a crime someday, you could be held in "prolonged detention." Reports in U.S. state-controlled media imply that Obama's shocking new policy would only apply to Islamic terrorists (or, in this case, wannabe Islamic terrorists, and also kinda-sorta-maybe-thinking-about-terrorism dudes). As if that made it OK.
In practice, Obama wants to let government goons snatch you, me and anyone else they deem annoying off the street. Preventive detention is the classic defining characteristic of a military dictatorship. Because dictatorial regimes rely on fear rather than consensus, their priority is self-preservation rather than improving their people's lives. They worry obsessively over the one thing they can't control, what Orwell called "thoughtcrime"--contempt for rulers that might someday translate to direct action.
Locking up people who haven't done anything wrong is worse than un-American and a violent attack on the most basic principles of Western jurisprudence. It is contrary to the most essential notion of human decency. That anyone has ever been subjected to "preventive detention" is an outrage. That the President of the United States, a man who won an election because he promised to elevate our moral and political discourse, would even entertain such a revolting idea offends the idea of civilization itself.
Obama is cute. He is charming. But there is something rotten inside him. Unlike the Republicans who backed Bush, I won't follow a terrible leader just because I voted for him. Obama has revealed himself. He is a monster, and he should remove himself from power.
"Prolonged detention," reported The New York Times, would be inflicted upon "terrorism suspects who cannot be tried."
"Cannot be tried." Interesting choice of words.
Any "terrorism suspect" (can you be a suspect if you haven't been charged with a crime?) can be tried. Anyone can be tried for anything. At this writing, a Somali child is sitting in a prison in New York, charged with piracy in the Indian Ocean, where the U.S. has no jurisdiction. Anyone can be tried. Why is it, exactly, that some prisoners "cannot be tried"?
The Old Grey Lady explains why Obama wants this "entirely new chapter in American law" in a boring little sentence buried a couple past the jump and a couple of hundred words down page A16: "Yet another question is what to do with the most problematic group of Guantánamo detainees: those who pose a national security threat but cannot be prosecuted, either for lack of evidence or because evidence is tainted."
In democracies with functioning legal systems, it is assumed that people against whom there is a "lack of evidence" are innocent. They walk free. In countries where the rule of law prevails, in places blessedly free of fearful leaders whose only concern is staying in power, "tainted evidence" is no evidence at all. If you can't prove that a defendant committed a crime--an actual crime, not a thoughtcrime--in a fair trial, you release him and apologize to the judge and jury for wasting their time.
It is amazing and incredible, after eight years of Bush's lawless behavior, to have to still have to explain these things. For that reason alone, Obama should resign.
© 2009 Ted Rall
Ted Rall is a columnist for Universal Press Syndicate and is the author of the new book "Silk Road to Ruin: Is Central Asia the New Middle East?," an in-depth prose and graphic novel analysis of America's next big foreign policy challenge.
I fear that Obama has plans to create a new generation of the ‘disappeared’.
Pro lifers
NRA members
Veterans returning from serving our country
Evangelicals
Real Catholics
Ted just punched his ticket to reeducation camp, if and when the day ever comes
I'm supposed to be impressed by a guy who's writing a comic book about foreign policy?
Obama: the great unifier...
I seem to remember when the hateful cartoons and screeds by Mr. Rall were not allowed on FR.
I suppose that time has passed?
You were the dumba$$ who believed him in the first place, none of his promises were remotely possible, though you want them to be in your pollyanna world view. Enjoy the idiocy you’ve created moron.
This guy has to be one of the unhappiest people on earth.
These aren't criminal suspects plucked randomly from civil society. They are people captured in military operations. "Lack of evidence" means not enough to sustain a conviction in a court, but enough to have moral certainty about the need to detain them. What is it about "being at war" that leftist morons have such a hard time comprehending?
Featuring an interpretive dance analysis of Afghanistan war strategies, no less....
Wait until BO starts arresting people who are non Democrats. All he has to do is get the voter roles from the states and presto, he has a detention list as long as my u know what.
Then we get Biden...eeeek!
_____________
So??? By far the lesser of the 2 evils.
Pelosi? This guy's pushing for Jeremiah Wright.
Ted Rall is vermin.
If Obama has lost Rall, can Olbermann be far behind? They were twins, you know.
I hope so. I really, really hope so.
:-D )))
Ted Rall is an admitted anarchist who only supports gun rights so he can be packing when it all comes down.
He’s demanded the impeachment of both Bush and Clinton.
touche
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.