Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

America was founded on Christian Principles, not Islamic, Judaic, Buddhist, or any other religion. That's why our coins and bill have In God We Trust on them. And the Pledge allegiance says "Under God".

If they want to erect a Star of David that would not be offensive since Christianity's base is based on the Jewish Scriptures. But no other religion's symbols.

1 posted on 05/25/2009 2:42:41 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Iam1ru1-2

Even if it were offensive to non-Christians, how does that constitute a reason to take them down? People don’t have a right to not be offended.


31 posted on 05/25/2009 5:00:48 PM PDT by Jeb21 (www.jewsagainstobama.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
...it will be up to the Supreme Court to make a final determination as to whether a 7-foot cross remains standing in a California desert to memorialize war veterans. The cross was first erected in 1934 in what is now the federally protected Mojave Desert Preserve by a group of veterans whose doctors advised them that the desert heat would help them recover from shell shock. Veterans today say this war memorial and others like it across the country that use religious symbols are under attack by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "They are not the enemy; they are just dead wrong," says Joe Davis, spokesman for the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW). But the civil liberties group says the cross is offensive to Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim and other non-Christian veterans.
Rio de Janiero had better watch its step too.
38 posted on 05/25/2009 5:35:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

What is offensive about a Christian symbol to those of other faiths?

Where is the “tolerance” —the respect for “diversity” etc etc etc?


39 posted on 05/25/2009 5:38:57 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Well, I'm a member of the VFW and I question government funds for a religious symbol too.

Now, if the VFW and the Legion want to take a separate collection...optional line item in the dues along with fund raisers...to put up any type of monument or symbol the contributors wish, I'm OK with that.

But taxpayer money at a Veteran's Memorial should be spent areligiously.

41 posted on 05/25/2009 6:03:23 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

keep your powder dry, we gonna need it. I ditto the HORSE SHIT


43 posted on 05/25/2009 6:10:18 PM PDT by cork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

Note to the Justices:

God is watching.....


46 posted on 05/25/2009 7:06:24 PM PDT by prairiebreeze ( Pretender-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama....an arrogant embarrassment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

This crap has got to be stopped.


52 posted on 05/25/2009 8:02:54 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (What did Obama's Teleprompter know, and when did it know it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
Vets can be honored by Crosses...Stars of David....hell,even moslem symbols.....
53 posted on 05/25/2009 8:07:59 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
But the civil liberties group says the cross is offensive to Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim and other non-Christian veterans.

I'm a non-Christian veteran. As far as I'm concerned, the only offensive part is the ACLU trying to have a memorial to veterans taken down.

I do however have to disagree with the idea that only a cross or Jewish Star of David would be acceptable. I served with a few muslims, who all served honorably. If someone wanted to erect a memorial to their service that was a red crescent, that's fine by me. And if someone wants to erect a memorial for those of us who are atheist veterans, go right ahead.

58 posted on 05/25/2009 9:16:46 PM PDT by c.nugget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2

“They’re not the enemy”

That’s part of the problem right there! They are the enemy.


62 posted on 05/26/2009 5:09:12 AM PDT by demshateGod (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
If they're going to start elminating battlefieldcrosses, they certainly have their work cut out for them. Can one imagine the implications?


64 posted on 05/26/2009 8:18:39 AM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Iam1ru1-2
The suit worked its way through the system and, in 2004, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the memorial violated the First Amendment clause forbidding an establishment of religion and ordered its removal.

How the hell does the erection of a cross in some desert establish a religion?

And furthermore if a state did somehow establish a religion, doesn't the first amendment clearly state: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion...." .

69 posted on 05/26/2009 6:27:28 PM PDT by JPJones (bookreviews.2ya.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson