Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: csense
Well, controlled domolition takes out key structural elements simultaneously (or in a preplanned sequence) so that the weight of the building collapses the structure in a desired fashion.

The fires heated the structural elements of the towers supporting the structure above the fire floors, having the same effect as a controlled demolition would have. Had those structural elements all not been heated similarly and simultaneously, the upper part of the structures would have toppled, collapsing at the site of the greatest weakness first, and causing the upper part of the structure to fall over rather than remain more or less vertical and pancake the floors below it.

In that sense, the effect was similar to a planned demolition (of any building in a developed area) which would not have toppled the building, but caused it to fall vertically, more or less on site.

13 posted on 05/24/2009 2:11:40 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

And of course the building wasn’t designed to take a hit like that. The insulation on the steel supports was blown off, the central core damaged and a sudden hot fire from the jet’s fuel.
Who could build with that possibility in mind?


17 posted on 05/24/2009 2:57:17 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson