Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
The difference is that if Bush begins debating with Obama, the issue becomes Bush, rather than the issues that actually matter.

LOL. Using your rationale, just substitute Cheney for Bush. In many ways the Left has painted Cheney as the villian and Bush the incompetent puppet. It is up to Bush to make national security the issue, just like Cheney is doing.

Note that, just by being silent, Bush has been forcefully vindicated by Obama himself on several issues -- be it course reversals, or by Obama's approach being demonstrably stupid.

The reason why Obama is changing his position on things like fighting to keep the additional photos from being released is because of pressure from the likes of his own military leaders and Cheney. He can't close Gitmo because the other countries don't want the detainees nor do members of Congree want them in the US. The only reason that Bush is being vindicated is because Cheney is defending those policies and bringing the defense of them to the country. Something they wouldn't get from listening to the speeches or press conferences of Obama. Remember the clamor from the MSM, the Dems, and some Reps that Cheney should shut up. And a number of FReepers agreed with it.

When Cheney speaks, the issues themselves tend to take center stage.

No, the Dems and MSM will try to make Cheney the issue and not the issue of national security. The spin is going on at this very minute. That is the way the Left operates. Obama's speech today was a direct attack on the Bush administration and "the mess" they left for Obama to clean up from the economy to Gitmo. If Bush had any balls, he would speak up instead of allowing Obama to defame him and his administration. And the very real possibility exists for a "Truth Commission" and prosecutions.

1,043 posted on 05/21/2009 11:36:13 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 994 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
LOL. Using your rationale, just substitute Cheney for Bush.... It is up to Bush to make national security the issue, just like Cheney is doing.

Nope. Your well-known grasp of subtle distinctions seems to have abandoned you. Again.

1,050 posted on 05/21/2009 11:46:11 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

All the pundits — like Shep Smith — screaming about the audacity of Obama speaking out because Bush is being silent conveniently forget Bush never said anything bad about Clinton after he took office and that same silence was greeted with nothing but derisive statements from Clinton(s) and Gore. I have always had great respect for Cheney and have even more now for his firm and decisive clarity on what is important and his backbone in taking it head on, no matter the criticism.


1,064 posted on 05/21/2009 12:22:02 PM PDT by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson