It appears the poster only displays “facts” that are convenient to whatever “theory” he is discussing at the time ... even if those “facts” contradict what he had posted on other threads
Hey, if you ever feel like exploring the circular reasoning and uniformitarian assumptions that form the foundation of the Temple of Darwin dating schemes, feel free to give me a ping.
Maybe he’s an open minded individual who likes to consider all the facts.
I found the link from post #1 to be very informative.
We are discovering more and more ‘facts’ about the Earth every day.