Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mo
Respectfully, I think that explanation is too facile especially when one considers the breadth of geographic and economic interests represented by Democrats in Congress. It is too pat and not persuasive to believe that representatives from coal mining districts or energy producing states believe this administration is advancing the interests of their constituents when it openly declares it will put them out of business.


41 posted on 05/16/2009 6:40:20 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

“...not persuasive to believe that representatives from coal mining districts or energy producing states believe this administration is advancing the interests of their constituents when it openly declares it will put them out of business.”

Except that its ALREADY happening...

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/60-second-science/post.cfm?id=epa-ruling-halts-all-new-coal-fired-2008-11-14

The only logical conclusion is that proportional representation is failing in the face of some financial/intellectual ideology.


43 posted on 05/16/2009 6:57:41 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson