You spew liberal nonsense on a conservative website and then have the gall to pretend to have authority over a single soul to tell them what is or isn’t acceptable and what they should or shouldn’t do?
That’s a tad on the surreal side there fella! :)
I wasn’t arguing about radiometric dating on the other thread, I merely pointed out it’s not settled science. You blew that off, so in an attempt to get you to pay closer attention, I showed you post #218 on the other thread, that others understand it’s not settled science besides me.
Reading is still fundamental. But I can’t make you read.
“I was saying something about radiometric dating because I was referred to an article about it in the thread, and because it’s relevant to the content of the article, since that is the methology that’s being challenged.”
And ...
AGAIN...
I showed you it’s not settled science. It’s not settled science on this thread, not on another thread, not on FR period, and most certainly not scientifically in general.
Typically though, you want to run off the rails over decorum.
Again.
In short, you’re a train wreck.
Anything but the argument at hand because you know you don’t have one.
Radiometric dating is not “settled science”, and scientists themselves are still debating about it’s validity, so unlike algore science, “the debate isn’t over”.
So don’t keep asking the same failed questions, thread after thread after thread that have been adequately answered and knowingly ask THE SAME FAILED question AGAIN, that everyone knows you already know the answer to and expect a free pass.
Of course the debate isn't over. Some of it was in progress when you showed up to inject yourself into the middle of it and shut it down.