I’ve not forgotten my offer to pull together a little info via web search, allmendream.
You should take a look at this site, which handles the matter in a fairly unbiased way, not touting one or the other. Pay particular attention to George Ellis’ model about 2/3 of the way through.
http://knol.google.com/k/spiros-kakos/earth-at-the-center-of-the-universe/2jszrulazj6wq/39#
The Lense-Thirring Effect, referenced in one of the original quotes to which you directed me, is also of interest, with numerous attempts at testing for this effect. Success has been spotty, but by no means absent in all cases.
So, if you actually do have an open mind and a curious intellect, give it a look.
I know I don’t rule it out, but it has been sort of comical watching you try to turn the word “geocentrist” into some sort of epithet. It all depends upon your frame of reference I guess, lol.
The Gravitational model is clearly superior in that when we look out into the universe we see billions of data points all conclusively showing this simple fact...
Massive objects hold less massive objects in their gravitational orbit.
Now how could the massive Sun be moved around the tiny Earth? What force could cause the Sun to move, yet leave the Earth untouched?
Only mystical magical forces.