Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
Are there not several Geocentric Christians posting here on this thread?

Do you think they are kooks? It is the obvious implication that I am trying to make all Creationist look like kooks by bringing up the reality of Creationists who are Geocentricists, posting right here on FR.

I am not the one trying to say who is a Christian and who is just “claiming” to be a Christian, that would be YOU. The direct implication being that the majority of Christian denominations that have no problem with the findings of science are somehow less Christian or a different Christian than you.

Way to point out just what a whacked out fringe movement Creationism is; by saying anyone who accepts science is only “claiming” to be Christian.

252 posted on 05/14/2009 1:40:23 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream

am not the one trying to say who is a Christian and who is just “claiming” to be a Christian, that would be YOU. The direct implication being that the majority of Christian denominations that have no problem with the findings of science are somehow less Christian or a different Christian than you.

Way to point out just what a whacked out fringe movement Creationism is; by saying anyone who accepts science is only “claiming” to be Christian.


Apparently, in your world, a biologist, to be a biologist has to strictly follow the dogma, not the science, but the godless ideology called science, and either he’s an evo or a fringe kook. End of story, no dissent allowed. Ever.

But when it comes to defining a Christian....ehhhh, well, not so much.

No need to follow any Christian instruction in the Bible, just make whatever up as you go along, and reject what you don’t like, easy breezy.

To say you’re incoherent and inconsistent would be putting it mild.

BTW, can you present any serious critical peer review of evolution? Critical being the operative word.


272 posted on 05/14/2009 2:10:20 PM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream; metmom

am not the one trying to say who is a Christian and who is just “claiming” to be a Christian, that would be YOU. The direct implication being that the majority of Christian denominations that have no problem with the findings of science are somehow less Christian or a different Christian than you.

Way to point out just what a whacked out fringe movement Creationism is; by saying anyone who accepts science is only “claiming” to be Christian.


Apparently, in your world, a biologist, to be a biologist has to strictly follow the dogma, not the science, but the godless ideology called science, and either he’s an evo or a fringe kook. End of story, no dissent allowed. Ever.

But when it comes to defining a Christian....ehhhh, well, not so much.

No need to follow any Christian instruction in the Bible, just make whatever up as you go along, and reject what you don’t like, easy breezy.

To say you’re incoherent and inconsistent would be putting it mild.

BTW, can you present any serious critical peer review of evolution? Critical being the operative word.


273 posted on 05/14/2009 2:10:25 PM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson