To: ClearCase_guy; tacticalogic
"
To a certain extent, if the animal is found not to be quite so old, then it becomes difficult to make the case that the rocks are so very old." Obviously the formation cannot be older than the critter that's buried under it.
As you can see, the evos are in panic-overdrive here, throwing their illogical assertions left and right to cloud the issue.
14 posted on
05/12/2009 7:59:47 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
To: editor-surveyor
As you can see, the evos are in panic-overdrive here, throwing their illogical assertions left and right to cloud the issue. Can you show me one of these "illogical assertions"?
16 posted on
05/12/2009 8:01:20 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: editor-surveyor
Obviously the formation cannot be older than the critter that's buried under it. I don't know, I think my "rock clawing and meticulous replacement" theory has some merit.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson