Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GodGunsGuts; PugetSoundSoldier

To follow up on what GGG said, a further reason for opposition to evolution is that if we deny what Jesus said when referring back to Adam, we are implying that He is a liar. If He were to be a liar, He could not be our Savior.


28 posted on 05/08/2009 7:17:38 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Binghamton_native
To follow up on what GGG said, a further reason for opposition to evolution is that if we deny what Jesus said when referring back to Adam, we are implying that He is a liar. If He were to be a liar, He could not be our Savior.

Sure, it MUST be literal because as we know the Lord never spoke in metaphors or parables...

Maybe the Lord was talking philosophically that since the beginning of human consciousness we have sinned and forsaken God?

If the Bible is exact historically, then explain Cain's wife. It's NOT in the Bible, and there ARE no other children from Adam and Eve until after Seth (which happens after Cain's wife gives birth to Enoch).

Apparently Cain had a wife that was not born or Adam and Eve (if you read the Bible literally). So where did she come from, since there weren't any other people at that time except for Adam, Eve, and Cain?

41 posted on 05/09/2009 2:47:43 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson