[doc30]

CottShop, GGG, your posts are Epic Science Fail. Lay readers will come away with less knowledge than if they didn’t read your posts. In summary, you simply don’t know what you are talking about.

[AndrewC]

[Doc30, your post is an]* Epic Science Fail. Lay readers will come away with less knowledge than if they didn’t read your posts. In summary, you simply don’t know what you are talking about.

*Substitutions---mine

1. You do not address a specific claim.
2. You provide opinion and not a single shred of "evidence".
3. Your first and only post is an arrogating statement representing a class to which you apparently do not belong(they vs we).
4. Therefore, I think your post is self-referential.

[CottShop]

[[CottShop, GGG, your posts are Epic Science Fail.]]

Per usual Doc- you offer NOTHING but ad hominem ‘content’ Per usual you offer nothign to refute ANYTHING. Those reading my posts will see how silly the arguments about living in an open system allows for macroevolution claims really are- I’d say that if you have evidnece refuting it, then present it, but really, I’m tired of your games and glaring generalizatiosn which do absolutely nothign but attack without substance- such ‘arguments’ are better suited to lesser sites that care nothign for science or evidence like TO or DC

*Substitutions-—mine

You do not address a specific claim.
You provide opinion and not a single shred of “evidence”.
Your first and only post is an arrogating statement representing a class to which you apparently do not belong(they vs we).
Therefore, I think your post is self-referential.

(Thanks Andrew- too tired to respond to his petty post)