Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ira_Louvin

lol silly little assumption driven charts- Macroevolution is impossible- aint ya heard the news? Chemically, biologically, and mathematically, not to mention it violates the second law- not just in a few instances or singular events’ but in trillions of steps- no amount of ‘singular examples of static instances’ such as ice crystal formations will overcome these impossibilities either-

Hey- I set a round rock next to an orange the other day and by golly they looked similar too- spose they too evolved one from another? Homology is NOT an evolutionist’s best friend I’m afraid

I take it you pilferred those charts from coyoteman?


163 posted on 05/10/2009 10:32:45 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
Macroevolution is impossible- aint ya heard the news? Chemically, biologically, and mathematically, not to mention it violates the second law

Then you do not understand the second law of thermodynamics. Please tell us what you think it is, and why it is being violated.

166 posted on 05/11/2009 6:16:51 AM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: CottShop

I will say it again; we both know that all of science is based on assumptions

You can never prove a scientific theory you can only disprove it.

Repeating the same fallacy over and over again does not make it true.

As far as the thermodynamics misconception please see my post # 50 in this thread

· “You really need to brush up on your talking points
Even one of GGG’s favorite web sites “Creation Minstries International” is advising against using the Thermodynamics argument.

This is listed under “Arguments we think creationist should not use”

‘The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics began at the Fall.’ This law says that the entropy (‘disorder’) of the Universe increases over time, and some have thought that this was the result of the Curse. However, disorder isn’t always harmful. An obvious example is digestion, breaking down large complex food molecules into their simple building blocks. Another is friction, which turns ordered mechanical energy into disordered heat—otherwise Adam and Eve would have slipped as they walked with God in Eden! A less obvious example to laymen might be the sun heating the Earth—to a physical chemist, heat transfer from a hot object to a cold one is the classic case of the Second Law in action. Also, breathing is based on another classic Second Law process, gas moving from a high pressure to low pressure. Finally, all beneficial processes in the world, including the development from embryo to adult, increase the overall disorder of the universe, showing that the Second Law is not inherently a curse.

http://creation.com/arguments-we-think-creationists-should-not-use

You seem to overlook the fact that the 2nd law of thermodynamics only applies to a closed system, which the earth is not.


180 posted on 05/11/2009 8:00:27 PM PDT by Ira_Louvin (Go tell them people lost in sin, They need not fear the works of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson