Yes. They would be wrong. They would be used to by the Temple of Darwin to push their materialist religion (”see, even the Christians are going along with the program!”). And it’s just plain bad theology. But again, I still maintain it is possible to be a Christian and believe in evolution.
OK, so you believe evolution is actually a materialist religion, but you can still be a Christian and believe in evolution.
Meaning you believe that any Christian who believes in evolution must be a misguided brother and should be corrected. Either that or you support polytheism but I assume that is not correct.
OK, so how about correcting as Paul did? How did Paul correct the early Christians? Not by ridicule and derision and name-calling as you do. How about you show a little Christian brotherliness yourself in how you address the issue?
So, give me the Biblically-based reason why evolution cannot be. You are limited to the Scriptures only as that is the Pauline approach that worked rather well in the early Church. Go back to what works, rather than being an attacker, similar to the forgiven debtor that Jesus spoke negatively about in His parable.
Oh, and I’ve never heard of David Abel, and his reasoning is pretty far-off. GAs rely upon the same mechanism as the theory of genetic evolution and genetic drift; in fact, that is where the concept of GAs came from, computer scientists working with biologists to solve rather tricky problems...
“I still maintain it is possible to be a Christian and believe in evolution.”
Well, in that case, I take back some of the stuff I’ve said about you.