Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Reaganomical
A discussion of sex should be holistic

"Holistic"? Then you ought to include explicitly religious points of view, too, otherwise it's not really holistic.

But you can't do that in a public school. So it's already a given that you can't have a holistic discussion of sex, because explicitly religious values -- like mine -- aren't going to be permitted, except perhaps to be mocked and derided.

Given that my values and my value system are already written out of the picture, the least-objectionable position left to be taught is abstinence only.

I am, for the time being, blessed enough that I don't have to send my kids to government schools. I send them to schools which either explicitly teach my values, or which understand clearly that I pay the bills and my checks depend on my kids not being taught objectionable points of view.

19 posted on 05/08/2009 9:27:30 AM PDT by Campion ("President Barack Obama" is an anagram for "An Arab-backed Imposter")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

The sex positive agenda seeks to end all moral judgements over all sexual pairings, regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).

They oppose any of your “moral teachings”.

They believe Chrisitans are “sex negative”.

They are bigoted and hedonistic in their worldview.

There is a culturewar afoot and the President is standing on the Left side of it.


21 posted on 05/08/2009 9:50:30 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (If Liberals are so upset over torture, why did they mock John McCains stiff arms during the campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson