Posted on 05/07/2009 6:46:06 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta
In an effort to resolve this issue once and for all, the Obama Administration has put together a team tasked with producing a believable Hawaii Birth Certificate Forgery Efforts to compel President Barack Obama to produce a valid birth certificate for the purpose of proving he is constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States continue. Team Obama, however, has continually tried to dismiss the efforts as garbage. Barack Obama, however, is finding it more difficult to dismiss the question, and would like to be done with it once and for all. He was hoping the issue would simply die and go away, but the American People have refused to allow that to happen.
Despite the questions lingering about his citizenship, Barack Obama sits in the Oval Office and goes by the title of President of the United States of America. Ignore it as he may, the controversy regarding his eligibility remains. Eighteen law suits have been brought by citizens demanding proof of Obamas citizenship be provided.
The response from the Obama staff, as well as the response from a number of political pundits on both the left and right side of the aisle, has been that continuing to question Obamas eligibility to the office of POTUS is a waste of time....
(Excerpt) Read more at americandailyreview.com ...
That statement was news to me, so I googl;ed “Im running for senate, not the president” and “Obama”.
Here’s what I got:
Obama Birth Certificate ForgeryMay 7, 2009 ... to him about his origins and Obama cut him off and replied, I’m running for senate, not the president... so it doesn’t apply. ...
209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/2246054/posts?page=2 - 2 hours ago - Similar pages
It’s your post #37 — LOL!!
The records were requested but the request was denied because the subponea was incorrectly served. the article about the records being released was an April fool’s joke courtesy of AP.
Any normal person would have said “of course I’m a US citizen”.
One Attention Whore suing another.
I believe that you are incorrect. I may be wrong (and if I am, please show me), but I believe that at the time he was born the law was that a person was a natural born citizen if:
1) both parents were US citizens, no matter where the child is born [N/A in this case];
2) the child was born in the US, no matter the citizenship of the parents [the old "anchor baby" problem, see below]; and
3) one of the parents was a US citizen who was a citizen of the US for 5 years after their 16th birthday (thus needing to be at least 21 - and BO's mother was only 19 when he was born) [also N/A here].
Since 1 and 3 don't apply to him, BO can only be a "natural born citizen" if #2 applies...hence the BIG DEAL about whether he was, in fact, born in Hawaii or not. If yes, then he's eligible to be President; if no, then he's undoubtedly guilty of multiple felonies, in addition to not being eligible to be the POTUS.
A "Certificate of Live Birth" is NOT a birth certificate - only the long form can establish that he was born in Hawaii (or maybe there isn't one, meanng that he wasn't born in Hawaii).
Same here, did not get a SS # until I was 16.
obumpa
You’re making that up.
I would imagine there are filing boxes in Hawaii’s vault so that Obama’s document would be pressed in with hundreds of others.
A forensic analysis of Obama’s document compared with documents in the same filing box would clarify whether the documents are identically aged.
Also Toronto’s museum staff would certainly be alerted to any diversion.
Nope, forgery not in progress.
Obama’s lawyers will continue to stonewall. If there is no valid long form BC in Hawaii’s vault, then they know that a less than perfect forgery will be detected and the whole thing will result in a process of discovery.
Ok then... what effect does the term “natural born citizen” have as it appears in Article 1, Section 2 of the US Constitution?
Article 1, Section 2 states:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;
Based on Chief Justice Marshall’s opinion as stated in Marbury vs Madison...
It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; and therefore such construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.
The term “natural born citizen” must have an effect on the requirements for the office of President.
However though, not the same effect as the term “citizen” in the 14th Amendment, Section 1, Clause 1:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
That effect can not be the same as the effect which the term “citizen” has in the 14th Ammendment.
There is! Article 2, Section One of the U.S. Constitution states that the President must be a natural born American citizen. The only evidence available is that Obama was born in Kenya.
But there is no requirement that a candidate must prove it. None.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.