[Phileleutherus Franciscus]

Testable, verifiable, repeatable nonsense does not science make either. The so-called “peers” doing the so-called “verifying” are fellow brain-washed darwin-cultists.

You realize that to buy this assertion, one has to believe in a worldwide, century and a half long conspiracy among millions of scientists? It's kind of like the 9/11 "Truthers" that way.

[tpanther]

Another debunked liberal tactic, when someone doesn’t march with the Hissy-fit Matthew’s of the world, well then they’ve gotta be a conspiracy theorist?

Sorry, but you’re on FR, you should know better. Liberalism doesn’t work here.

But supposing the premise (short of conspiracy) were true, wasn’t this the view of oh I dunno, near 100% of scientists of a flat earth until they knew better?

To the contrary, the “theory” is merely evolving and eventually it’ll go away.

The truth sets us free like that, scientifically and other- wise.

You should pay dissentfromdarwin.org a visit! The growing list of scientists and their observations are enlightening!

Besides, any “theory” that now sees any and all dissent, criticism or even mere questions, as a “religious attack on science” never really had a snowball’s chance anyway.

[metmom]

You realize that to buy this assertion, one has to believe in a worldwide, century and a half long conspiracy among millions of scientists? It's kind of like the 9/11 "Truthers" that way.

Hey, noob. Welcome to FR.

Comparing creationists to *9-11 "Truthers"* already?

Enjoy your (short) stay.