Skip to comments.
ANOTHER UNINFORMED FAIRTAX CRITIC
Nelz Nuze ^
| May 6, 2009
| Neal Boortz
Posted on 05/06/2009 11:57:23 AM PDT by Turret Gunner A20
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-330 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: JRochelle
You already pay that much. Making it visible makes you mad. That’s the idea.
22
posted on
05/06/2009 12:31:49 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: xcamel
Ramsey isn't educated on the fairtax, scamel.
23
posted on
05/06/2009 12:32:37 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: Principled
Do not.
You are so misinformed.
24
posted on
05/06/2009 12:34:28 PM PDT
by
JRochelle
(Don't smoke the Hopium.)
To: JTHomes
The true is the problem is not the tax collection system. There are several of those flat tax / fair tax / income tax / direct apportionment, etc
The PROBLEM is spending and until that gets put under control, it wont matter what type of tax collection system is place.
To: Filo
I am a FairTax supporter. However, I don’t totally agree with the plan as it is currently cast.
I agree that the prebate is a bad idea, and one element that could lead future legislators to attempts at ‘tweaking’. That’s where the current income tax model started going way wrong, years ago, and now leaves us with over 60,000 pages of legalese that likely make a tax cheat out of all of us in one way or another.
In addition, I believe the proposed rate is too high.
Further, I don’t believe the ‘double tax’ argument is a show stopper. I’m sure we can find a way around this concern.
The long and short of it: Taxing INCOME is the wrong way to fund government. Taxing CONSUMPTION is fair, equitable, and less prone to fraud.
And, lastly, I firmly believe that ANY tax reform without SPENDING reform is a recipe for disaster.
We must rein in the Federal government and return it to its Constitutional limitations.
26
posted on
05/06/2009 12:35:48 PM PDT
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Change we can look forward to.)
To: taxcontrol
Fairtax bad Flattax good
Please give us your comparison.
27
posted on
05/06/2009 12:36:40 PM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Socialism is a good idea until you run out of other peopleÂ’s money. Margaret Thatcher)
To: xcamel
By the way x -- it'a spelled really.
28
posted on
05/06/2009 12:38:52 PM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Socialism is a good idea until you run out of other peopleÂ’s money. Margaret Thatcher)
To: Filo
1. Prebate is socialist
I suggest you read Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto. One plank is a heavy progressive tax on income. Communists support any tax on productivity as it will discourage people from working, making them depend on the government and thereby empower socialism. The prebate only covers taxes on necessities up to the cost of living. The amount will be far too small for a household to sustain itself on the prebate alone. At least one member in the household will still have to work just as they do currently.
2. pre-earned/saved money is re-taxed when plan is implemented
Savings will no longer be taxed under The Fair Tax as it is with the income tax since any tax on income will be eliminated. That will more than offset what has been taxed.
3. tax rate is way too high
Based on what data do you make such an otherwise vague and empty claim? The tax burden with the income tax is far greater than the what the rate will be for The Fair Tax. Most people fall into the 15% income tax bracket. Add in the 7.65% payroll tax along with the same rate for the employer matching. Then factor the nearly 23% embedded taxes in every thing we buy due corporate income taxes being passed onto the consumer at each stage of production and the current rate is over 53%! That will be replaced with the 23% consumption tax rate. I don't know about you but I'll take a 30% reduction any day!
29
posted on
05/06/2009 12:39:03 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: JRochelle
What is your net effective federal tax rate? Do you know?
30
posted on
05/06/2009 12:39:45 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: JTHomes
I don’t get the prebate.
Fair tax is supposed to relieve us from the need for the IRS and reporting our income to the government.
How are they going to determine what the prebate should be if they don’t know what our income is?
31
posted on
05/06/2009 12:42:07 PM PDT
by
toast
To: toast
How are they going to determine what the prebate should be if they dont know what our income is? They don't base it on income.
It's based on poverty level spending.
32
posted on
05/06/2009 12:43:26 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: Turret Gunner A20
Turret, you and I have discussed this on other posts, no need to consume more bandwidth rehashing the same points.
To: Man50D
"2. pre-earned/saved money is re-taxed when plan is implemented""Savings will no longer be taxed under The Fair Tax as it is with the income tax since any tax on income will be eliminated. That will more than offset what has been taxed."
I think he means that when you have savings now, that money, and the interest on that money has been heavily taxed. So if the fair tax is implemented, and you spend any of your savings, it will be taxed again with the "fair tax." That's a really serious problem. You would lose a huge chunk of money that has already been taxed to the hilt.
To: taxcontrol
Fairtax bad
Flattax good
The Fair Tax is a flat tax but on consumption instead of productivity with only one rate charged at the point of sale. A flat tax on income is a plank in the Communist Manifesto. To quote "A heavy progressive or graduated income tax".. Marx and Engels understood taxing productivity discourages people from working and forces them to turn to the state for dependence.
This country already tried a flat tax on income and it has turned into the oppressive system we have today. People were taxed 1% on their first $20,000 of income and 7% on income over $500,000 when the 16th Amendment was enacted in 1913. It was essentially a flat tax since so few people earned more than $500,000 in 1913. Another flat tax on income will morph back into the same mutli tiered increasingly complex, indecipherable monstrosity we have today only faster thanks to the thousands of lobbyists that didn't exist in 1913.
35
posted on
05/06/2009 12:50:51 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: TheOldLady
This is the problem the nrst faces IMO. It is mitigated by some things but this is the major obstacle. They gotta figure a way to avoid this. jmho
36
posted on
05/06/2009 12:51:49 PM PDT
by
Principled
(Get the capital back! NRST!)
To: Principled
I don't know. But I do know we got most of what we paid in income taxes back last year.
And I do know that should I buy a 200,000 home, and the sales tax was 23%, I would have to get a loan for that. And then pay interest on that loan. That would suck. My property taxes are about 1%.
So the fair tax sucks.
37
posted on
05/06/2009 12:52:26 PM PDT
by
JRochelle
(Don't smoke the Hopium.)
To: Las Vegas Ron
The "prebates" in the Fair Tax is a recipe for disaster and makes absolutely no sense
Care to elaborate how lowering the tax rate by ensuring people don't pay taxes on necessities up to the poverty level will be a disaster?
38
posted on
05/06/2009 12:52:37 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
To: xcamel
Once youve completely convinced yourself you can fly, throwing yourself off a cliff is perfectly logical. ditto the fairtax.
Hey, that's real cutesy -- wrong though it is -- where did you plagarize it from?
39
posted on
05/06/2009 12:56:38 PM PDT
by
Turret Gunner A20
(Socialism is a good idea until you run out of other peopleÂ’s money. Margaret Thatcher)
To: toast
How are they going to determine what the prebate should be if they dont know what our income is?
Per the Fair Tax Act:
(d) Annual Registration- In order to receive the family consumption allowance provided by section 301, a qualified family must register with the sales tax administering authority in a form prescribed by the Secretary. The annual registration form shall provide--
40
posted on
05/06/2009 12:58:06 PM PDT
by
Man50D
(Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-330 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson