Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

[[It’s only about the way scientists express themselves in scientific writing.]]

Lol- how they ‘express themselves’- that’s precious

[[That statement reveals the scorn so many creationists have for education, hard work, and experience, an attitude I’m always disappointed to see on a conservative forum.]]

Ahhhh yes- the scorn Creationists have- FR has exposed the compelte contempt that sites liek TO and DC and other ‘science’ sites have towards Christians, but when a Christian points out hte blatant attempts by scientists to divert attention away from the central issues being discussed, we’re labelled as ‘scornful’ lol You betcha- Whatever Hahaha

[[I can only guess that the “unwarranted assumptions” accusation refers to the words “paragneiss” and “highly metamorphosed sediments.”]]

Nope sorry- it was explained to you why- you conveniently ignored the explanation apparently, and just wish to further argue somethign beyond what was actually discussed- have fun arguing with yourself

[[I doubt either you or WC have any idea why geologists decided those rocks are what they say.]]

Don’t bet the farm on that little assumption- as mentioned, it was already pointed out to you why and how the critics were INTENTIONALLY obscuring the main points- but whatever- you just keep tryign to nitpick where no meat is left to pick from- again- you’ll be arguign with yourself- not goign to play your usual silly games while you pretend to bwe ‘dissappointed’ at Creationists and pretend to be ‘objective’ which you most certainly are not


247 posted on 05/07/2009 8:19:48 PM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
Lol- how they ‘express themselves’

I cannot for the life of me see what's funny about that. Do you ever read anything the least bit technical or specific to a certain field? Oh wait, yes you do. Is there some reason it's funnier for scientists to use words like "paragneiss" than for creationists to use words like "holobaramin"?

Nope sorry- it was explained to you why

I think I must have intruded on a discussion you're having with the voices in your head, for which I apologize. I've only been talking about that three-sentence paragraph complaining about the sentence with the big words. No one has explained what the unwarranted assumptions were in that sentence.

253 posted on 05/07/2009 11:58:05 PM PDT by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson