To: CurlyDave
Hmmm. Interesting exegisis. You are saying that Paul's new testament injunction against knowing fornication was somehow controverted by an old testament instance of unknowing fornication?
Please don't start a Bible college. Solidwood wants us to get back on the comforting topic of Jeb Bush, so we can't talk Bible anymore.
117 posted on
05/05/2009 12:11:20 AM PDT by
farmer18th
(If you preach "too big to let fail," you're also preaching "too small to let succeed.")
To: farmer18th
It seems to be a matter of degree. Carrying on with a prostitute, here today and gone tomorrow, is not much more virtuous than carrying on with a family member related by marriage.
123 posted on
05/05/2009 12:21:13 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
To: farmer18th
Hmmm. Interesting exegisis. You are saying that Paul's new testament injunction against knowing fornication was somehow controverted by an old testament instance of unknowing
fornication? I call BS right there.
How can you possibly call that unknowing fornication? The black words on the white page in my text make it very clear that Judah believed he was lying with a prostitute. The price (a young goat) was agreed before the act took place. When he went back to look for her he was clearly looking for not only a prostitute, but a "shrine prostitute", possibly a "temple prostitute" in your translation.
The only thing in doubt was her identity and relationship to him.
To: farmer18th
Where did ol’ Woody boost Jeb Bush?
125 posted on
05/05/2009 12:23:09 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Beat a better path, and the world will build a mousetrap at your door.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson