[Oatka]

He did say, "There was no legitimate purpose for those photographs.

Who the Hell was he, to make that judgement? Dunno if this guy was elected or appointed but if the former, he should be dumped Big Time in the next election. If appointed, then dump the guy who appointed him.

As a grandparent, I have taken candid shots, although none were naked. How soon before ANY picture of a kid will be considered "suggestive" and "pornographic" because of the DA's twisted mindview? This is a good case of seeing nails everywhere when all you have is a hammer.

[TheOldLady]

"...ANY picture of a kid will be considered "suggestive" and "pornographic" because of the DA's twisted mindview?"

Excellent point. This has to be unconstitutional and illegal. The DA's gut? What a load of hooey.

Pretty soon, the real estate ads will read, "great schools, good location, DA not sick and twisted."

[tbw2]

And yet if she were actually a sex predator with a student, it’s a slap on the wrist.

[MaxMax]

In England you can be arrested for taking a picture of your own child playing in a park.
I guess America is using foreign law again. Sue their asses.