Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPsterinMA

Well, I think Clinton still wins in 92 if the economy goes south, but who knows. But Kemp would have been able to prevent a Perot run because he wouldn’t have raised taxes and been more conservative.

Ironically, also, in 88 Kemp could well have chosen Dole as his VP after beating him in the primaries as a greybeard to match up against Bentsen. Or, maybe he would have gone with new Senator and war hero John McCain from Arizona.

It’s interesting to think about.

But Regan selecting Bush really shaped the future of the party and conservatism in ways I’m sure he never really considered. Not that I blame him. No one imagines how their VP pick will affect things 20 years down the road or that their son will end up running. But that really did have a huge influence on the future.


119 posted on 05/02/2009 7:27:51 PM PDT by jeltz25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: jeltz25

Excellent points all!


125 posted on 05/02/2009 7:29:56 PM PDT by GOPsterinMA (Where can I take 'Austrian' lessons?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson