I don’t want you to believe anything.
What I want is for people to weigh the evidence themselves.
Date of discovery has nothing to do with understanding.
We discovered Gravity before most other laws, but still don’t have good grasp on the mechanics behind gravity. (google around about theory of gravity and you will find it’s a tough one). Most people think it’s well understood. Not true.
What’s understood is the action - not the mechanics - so as a result, there may be some affect in gravity we cannot predict if we can’t physically replicate the effect in the lab - because we have no basis to model the underlying physics (not the affect)
Back to the subject at hand, nuclear relationships are elemental, and should last lots longer than long chain proteins. Just a fact. Rocks last longer than bone.
I understand that. You do want me to consider the possibilities. But of all the possibilities there are for what could have gone wrong, the only one brought up for consideration is that there is something wrong with their dating.
There was not going to be any consideration of the possibility that any of the other variables involved might be wrong except that one.
Back to the subject at hand, nuclear relationships are elemental, and should last lots longer than long chain proteins. Just a fact. Rocks last longer than bone.
Indeed. They are also more stable and predictable. They don't move around and show up in unexpected places on their own. Organics are another story. Now, what's the simplest explanation?