Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BereanBrain
Just looking at the DNA and the date, the simplest explanation is the date is wrong.

How simple is the explanation that in spite of their best efforts, the sample was contaminated?

80 posted on 04/30/2009 9:37:01 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

um, this is not the only report from the field of non-mineralized “fossils” found.

I recall another case last year, where DNA was extracted from bone.


82 posted on 04/30/2009 9:46:32 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

here’s an interesting chain of events to ponder.

1) Earliest recorded history has tales of “dragons”.
Reptillian creatures of immense size with thick hides and scales that were gradually wiped out by heros. Some Dragons could even fly! Can you believe that?

2) Science proves these Reptillian monsters of large size don’t exist. How could something that large fly? After all, we explored the world, and there are no dragons.

3) 1000 years pass. We find bones of large obviously reptillian creatures
We call them “Dinosaurs”. We find out that some weighing up to a ton or two could actually FLY!

4) We are told that absolutely, under no circumstances could man have ever existed during the time of the dinosaurs.

5) We still have legends, tales, drawings, paintings, and in some cases etchings in caves of dinosaur like animals.

But it’s just circumstance that imagination conjured up a mythical beast that really DID EXIST.

Mere Coincidence?


85 posted on 04/30/2009 9:59:10 PM PDT by BereanBrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson