Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mentor2k

A really bad flood that was basically permanent because it wiped out coastal civilizations and created a new sea, would be a very big deal to early civilization.

For them, it wasn’t local; it was global. It was their known universe.

The best explanation for the story is not rainfall, but a cataclysmic inundation of coastal communities in the Mediterranean, either at Gibralter or at the Bosporus.

Such an explanation is heresy to those who believe that animals lined up two by two or seven by seven to enter Noah’s ark. But the burden on those who believe in a truly global flood like that is to explain how that happened, why there is no evidence of it globally, or really how it makes any sense at all.

How many chapters later in Genesis were they making the Tower of Babel? If God was “cleansing the earth”, it didn’t work out so well. Care to explain why He goofed up? What was accomplished by Noah’s Flood?

It did NOT happen.


42 posted on 05/01/2009 3:49:53 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
If you're saying there was "no flood", then you're going a step further than I will. Too many other ancient accounts of some type of torential flood were recorded. Homer's Iliad, the ancient Sumarian texts among other mythological writings all describe a flood event.

While I agree with you that "for them, it wasn't (a) local" flood, I disagree if you believe a flood didn't happen. And the story of Noah may very well be true. Maybe not literially, but I believe it possibly happened in some form of the way it was described in Genesis.
43 posted on 05/01/2009 4:19:34 PM PDT by mentor2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson