This does not concern Romney, but in listening to Rush it seems he was giving a strong, but subtle, endorsement for Palin. He did not mention names of course, but he kept on saying the Pubs need a strong voice, someone w/conviction...and at the end he quoted Al Davis, “just win baby” and the second time he said it he emphasized ‘baby’ in the way we(men) might refer to a babe,, as in ‘baby you look great!”
Perhaps I’m reading into it..I don’t know. But I think Rushbo wants a nominee all but sewn up BEFORE the primary and that nominee is is Palin.
And it’s fine with me.
brilliant. so... instead of supporting romney, you support mccain. and yet again, the republican party had to learn that America does not vote for old and crusty. period. palin is the only thing that brought out the voters, not mccain.
so, due to thinking like yours, we have 4 years of 0bama to endure. brilliant. if you were concerned romney would be to close to center, you could relax knowing the dems and the right would oppose him constantly.
and here comes 2012. palin... definitely should be there. who else? no to romney? who’s left? jindahl? please. got anyone else? fred? he phoned in his last attempt, he won’t even dial the number for 2012.
if you don’t watch it, we’ll end up with 0bama again in 2012... and then its all over (just ask the aztecs)
Thank you Jim. As Maggie once said to Reagan, “Don’t go wobbly on me now”
You signed up in 1997 just to post this??? :)
Well, in my opinion they were all mutts, but I did think Romney was best of the litter (haven’t had any use for Fred Thompson since the Clinton era hearings). I would like to have a choice of someone like Gov. Haley Barbour, Gov. Bob Riley, or (my governor) Mark Sanford ..... we can even see how they compare with Gov. Sarah Palin. We need to clean up the mess that has been made our election system and put a stop to this idiotic crossover voting before then.
Ditto bump.
Those are a lot of accusations against someone most of us thought was a Conservative.
I just checked out the "abortionist" and "homosexualist" claims, and you're right.
So, if not Mitt in 2012, then who???
It’s probably just as well, Jim. I know here in the South there are alot, and I do me ALOT, of hardcore Christians that won’t vote for him because he’s mormon. He has no chance of winning the White House.
Well, I sure learned my lesson about Mitt the hard way. Even after Mittwits trashed Fred Thompson lasst time, I was willing to give him a chance. I had been for George Allen first, then became a Frederalist after the macaca hit the fan.
But after Fred showed that he really didn’t want to POTUS all that much, I freaked out. It was down to Mitt, Huck and McStain, and I figured that Mitt was the lesser of those three evils. I was wrong. Huck was the lesser of those three evils, but none of the three was worth supporting.
Even after some Mittwits did their PhoneyFred smear website and started a campaign of lies about Fred, I was willing to support Mitt as a last resort. Yes, I even supported him as a potential VP pick for McCain - anything to keep Comrade Obama out of the White House.
Then I learned that Sarah Palin, who I had been led to believe was out of the running, was actually still being considered as a potential McCain running mate, and I gave her my support. And I’m still supporting her.
But I still didn’t think Mitt was a bad guy - just that ssome of his supporters were real snakes in the grass. Then I learned that the McCain staffers who were whispering lies about Gov. Palin into the ears of the drive-by media dogs had come to Team McCain from Romney’s organization.
Bingo! Same tactics that they used against Fred, and probab ly the same individuals. Some of these people, when mentioned in news stories, are described as “former Bush aides” - but they are Mittwits first and foremost.
They slimed Fred, and then they slimed Sarah. I learned my lesson. You can’t trust anyone from Romney’s Team. They will stab any perceived opponent in the back and then turn the knife. No sleazy campaign tactic is beneath them. They will work with the Democrats to take out a perceived GOP opponent.
This has nothing to do with Mitt’s religion. He could be a sun worshipper for all I care. It’s about his thirst for power. He will say or do anything to get power, even if it involves the politics of personal destruction and ruins someone else’s reputation.
Same goes for McCain. He let Obama win by refusing to take the issue of Jeremiah Wright to Obama. Perhapos even that wouldn’t have made the difference in the last election, but McCain could have at least tried, and he refused to do so.
I’m for Palin. She’s the only politician I trust anymore. the rest of ‘em can go to the devil.
Finally, I don’t think Mitt has a snowball’s chance in hell next time. He had all the money in the world last time, and he still couldn’t even beat a washed-up old coot like McCain. But if by some subterfuge he does get the GOP nomination, “I won’t get fooled again.”
Mittwits tirelessly defend this guy, but they can’t defend what was done to Fred and Sarah by their fellow Mittwits.
- JP
It would be so cool if you were against all RHINOS and not just Mormon ones.
With the (continuing) support of good and decent Americans we will have the opportunity to again vote for Sarah. Only next time she will be at the top of the ticket.
We are still in April 2009. It is way too early to know who is going to be in or who is going to be out by 2012.
Agreed.
For me, Jim, it’s Palin. She is the next Reagan. The rest of the GOP stable needs to be put out to pasture.
Anyone who watches on Youtube her recent speech to the Indiana Right to Life knows what I mean.
And if the GOP can’t get its act together soon with the ample opportunity to have a blowout against the Dems in 2010,then to h3ll with them too.
There is more political wisdom on this site then all of the GOP’s K Street political strategists put together.
If all that you said about Romney is true why did talk radio support him? Did any of them point out his glaring flaws?
Nope. They white washed his record and said the only issue he was ever wrong on was abortion but that he was 100% pro life now.
How do you explain talk radio’s treatment of Romney?
Welcome to where the rest of us “unappeasable’s” have been.
Jim I am with you on this one all the way. I'll go third party before I vote for another dang RINO.
I want to get behind a Candidate that would make the Gipper smile with fatherly pride.
Mitt ain't it!
My tongue is bleeding.
“But Romney is a NO go. And I don’t care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney’s in I’m out!
Amen!
Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]