Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeaHawkFan
If you would read the briefs, you would see that the facts demonstrate that his waiver was not voluntary.

Do you even know what a brief is?

Let's read this brief:

http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/pdfs/07-08/07-1529_Respondent.pdf

And why not the decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court?

http://www.lasc.org/opinions/2008/06KA1807.opn.pdf

132 posted on 04/26/2009 12:13:52 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998

I read all of them. The brief of the state of LA and the brief on behalf of the 10-11 state AGs is unpersuasive. They just want to be able to use coerced confessions to convict people for which there is no other evidence. If they were truly interested in seeking justice and not just convictions they would have no real reason to support the reversal of Jackson.

Are you telling me all those former federal prosecutors, former US Attorneys and William Sessions are simply looking for a way to let guilty people get off? It is absurd to think such a thing.

Do you really put that much trust in the honesty of cops, prosecutors and judges? If so, you are either one of those or hopelessly naive.


133 posted on 04/26/2009 12:19:00 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson