If you read the briefs in this case, you would never come to the conclusion that he guy voluntarily waived his right to counsel. If the CIA treated a terrorist like this guy was treated, Obama would have that CIA agent prosecuted.
Read the briefs before you make your comment. You look like an idiot otherwise.
Whether in a particular case someone did or did not voluntarily waive his right to counsel is a question of fact, not a question of law.
If a person was really coerced into waiving his right to counsel, his constitutional rights were violated. That is true WHETHER OR NOT the law as a constitutional matter is as set forth in Michigan vs Jackson.
Stick to football.