Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eternal_Bear
I’m sure the Chinese, Russians and Islamists will approve of us breaking down into smaller countries. Divide and Conquer is a concept as old as war.

That might be the conclusion of a tightly circumscribed mind. In a politically-correct world divide and conquer is non-existent.

For example if the US had 50 votes in the UN, it would change the muslim terrorist dynamic.

How many realize, for instance, that dar al Islam as a founding principle is "one world?" This is never stressed or discussed. Internally, Islam accepts that as a given; in fact is is required, under the severest penalty, of every muslim.

However, for political reasons even the tiniest muslim country has been declared "independent," for the specific purpose of perverting and overwhelming the UN membership into a tool of the main source of world terrorism today.

I have never bought into the "innocent muslim" rubric; muslim slaughter on a worlwide basis, virtually daily, could not be possible without the active or passive aid of the "silent" muslim.

131 posted on 04/22/2009 9:10:48 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Change is not a plan; Hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Publius6961
"For example if the US had 50 votes in the UN, it would change the muslim terrorist dynamic"

Huh? There wouldn't be an "United" States would there? The 50 states would start wrangling among themselves over issues like water rights and who gets to keep the nukes. Every state will demand an equal share of them! Would Blue States be happy if Red States had a lion's share of the military or vice versa? It will be chaos.

160 posted on 04/22/2009 9:52:07 AM PDT by Eternal_Bear (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson