Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shibumi
Animistic Universe anyone?

You know, I just watched a movie on cable the other night, Stardust, which used the same meme that Madeleine L’Engle introduced in Wrinkle - namely the idea of a star [in this case, Claire Danes's character], which has fallen to earth and must live as a human [sort of a dead star as fallen angel theme].

It's an interesting idea, here, though - that God might actively interfere with the fusion in the Sun and turn it up or turn it down depending upon His pleasure or displeasure with His children.

PS: If it weren't for the pervasive sodomy in the movie, Stardust would actually be kinduva nice story.

27 posted on 04/21/2009 10:42:43 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: KayEyeDoubleDee; All
“an interesting idea, here, though - that God might actively interfere with the fusion in the Sun and turn it up or turn it down..”

Another idea I find interesting and, perhaps explains what's going on. Are you ready? Don't flame me and call me a kook!

The sun (and all the other stars) is NOT a nuclear reaction, but instead, an electrical one.

Prior to Einstein's involvement in physics in the mid 20th century, there were many physicists who theorized this might be the case. Tesla was one those men. Prior to Einstein, Physics was a science dominated by objective experimentation of observable phenomena. Much of the research was pointing to the presence of a universal field of energy (ionized particles existing everywhere). Some, like Tesla, believed we would eventually be able to tap into this field for our electrical energy needs.

Einstein, primarily a Mathematician at heart, transformed the study of physics into a mathematical endeavor, with proofs being mathematical rather than experimentally testable. Because of the success of his methodology in the field of atomic energy, Einstein became almost a demigod to both academicians and the public alike.

However, now, even his most famous theory “Relativity” is starting to show inconsistencies with the universe as we've been able to better observe it in the years since his death.
As a result, the mathematical-physicists have had to invent new concepts such as “dark matter” to try to make the theory still work.

Some physicists are returning to the idea of a predominately electric universe theory, and they claim that theory matches up with the observed phenomena perfectly.

How does all this relate to the solar cycles? The field of ionized particles (now observed) in space, while universal, is not of constant density, (much like a visible fog thins and thickens as you move through it). As our star orbits around the galactic center, it passes through varying field density. This field is the source of the sun's energy which behaves more like an electrical node than a nuclear furnace. The sun dims or brightens in accordance with the field density.

62 posted on 04/21/2009 11:49:34 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY ( The Constitution needs No interpreting, only APPLICATION!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee
PS: If it weren't for the pervasive sodomy in the movie, Stardust would actually be kinduva nice story.

The movie was based on a book by Neil Gaiman. The cross-dressing captain was not in the book, that was a Hollywierd add-on. I liked the book better.

66 posted on 04/21/2009 12:41:12 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson